IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jnlaaa/v2015y2015i1n797594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polynomiography Based on the Nonstandard Newton‐Like Root Finding Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysztof Gdawiec
  • Wiesław Kotarski
  • Agnieszka Lisowska

Abstract

A survey of some modifications based on the classic Newton’s and the higher order Newton‐like root finding methods for complex polynomials is presented. Instead of the standard Picard’s iteration several different iteration processes, described in the literature, which we call nonstandard ones, are used. Kalantari’s visualizations of root finding process are interesting from at least three points of view: scientific, educational, and artistic. By combining different kinds of iterations, different convergence tests, and different colouring we obtain a great variety of polynomiographs. We also check experimentally that using complex parameters instead of real ones in multiparameter iterations do not destabilize the iteration process. Moreover, we obtain nice looking polynomiographs that are interesting from the artistic point of view. Real parts of the parameters alter symmetry, whereas imaginary ones cause asymmetric twisting of polynomiographs.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:wly:jnlaaa:v:2015:y:2015:i:1:n:797594
DOI: 10.1155/2015/797594
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/797594
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2015/797594?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jnlaaa:v:2015:y:2015:i:1:n:797594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1155/4058 .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.