IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jintdv/v19y2007i8p1143-1150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Panel studies in developing countries: case analysis of sample attrition over the past 16 years within the birth to twenty cohort in Johannesburg, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Shane A. Norris

    (MRC Mineral Metabolism Research Unit and Birth to Twenty Research Programme, Department of Paediatrics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa)

  • Linda M. Richter

    (University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa)

  • Stella A. Fleetwood

    (Birth to Twenty Research Programme, Department of Paediatrics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa)

Abstract

The implementation of panel studies in developing countries can prove valuable in driving evidenced-based policies. Case analysis from panel studies in developing countries are therefore useful in offering guidance and insight to deal with the immense challenges of implementing and following-up a panel study in a developing country. The aim of this paper is to describe the follow-up process within Birth to Twenty (Bt20), a birth cohort study in Johannesburg, South Africa, over the past 16 years; and to outline retention strategies and insight within the context of an urban, developing country setting. The main issues considered are: attrition (periodic and absolute), movement of individuals, name changes, cohort management and lessons learned. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Shane A. Norris & Linda M. Richter & Stella A. Fleetwood, 2007. "Panel studies in developing countries: case analysis of sample attrition over the past 16 years within the birth to twenty cohort in Johannesburg, South Africa," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(8), pages 1143-1150.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:19:y:2007:i:8:p:1143-1150
    DOI: 10.1002/jid.1390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/jid.1390
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/jid.1390?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cotter, Robert B. & Burke, Jeffrey D. & Stouthamer-Loeber, Magda & Loeber, Rolf, 2005. "Contacting participants for follow-up: how much effort is required to retain participants in longitudinal studies?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 15-21.
    2. Trudy Harpham & Sharon Huttly & Ian Wilson & Thea De Wet, 2003. "Linking public issues with private troubles: panel studies in developing countries," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(3), pages 353-363.
    3. Haaga, J. & Davanzo, J. & Peterson, C. & Peng, T.N., 1994. "Twelve-Year Follow-Up of Respondents in a Sample Survey in Peninsular Malaysia," Papers 94-19, RAND - Reprint Series.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nic Baigrie & Katherine Eyal, 2014. "An Evaluation of the Determinants and Implications of Panel Attrition in the National Income Dynamics Survey (2008-2010)," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 82(1), pages 39-65, March.
    2. Teresa Molina Millán & Karen Macours, 2017. "Attrition in randomized control trials: Using tracking information to correct bias," FEUNL Working Paper Series novaf:wp1702, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Faculdade de Economia.
    3. Alan Sánchez & Javier Escobal, 2020. "Survey attrition after 15 years of tracking children in four developing countries: The Young Lives study," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 1196-1216, November.
    4. Sangeetha Madhavan & Linda Richter & Shane Norris & Victoria Hosegood, 2014. "Fathers’ Financial Support of Children in a Low Income Community in South Africa," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 452-463, December.
    5. Teresa Molina Millan & Karen Macours, 2017. "Attrition in randomized control trials: Using tracking information to correct bias," NOVAFRICA Working Paper Series wp1702, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics, NOVAFRICA.
    6. Reza Che Daniels & Kim P. Ingle & Timothy S. L. Brophy, 2022. "Determinants of attrition between Waves 1 and 2 of South Africa's National Income Dynamics Study – Coronavirus Rapid Mobile Survey (NIDS‐CRAM)," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 90(4), pages 535-552, December.
    7. Nonhlanhla Tlotleng & Nisha Naicker & Angela Mathee & Andrew C. Todd & Palesa Nkomo & Shane A. Norris, 2022. "Association between Bone Lead Concentration and Aggression in Youth from a Sub-Cohort of the Birth to Twenty Cohort," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.
    8. Griffiths, Paula L. & Johnson, William & Cameron, Noël & Pettifor, John M. & Norris, Shane A., 2013. "In urban South Africa, 16 year old adolescents experience greater health equality than children," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 502-514.
    9. Sangeetha Madhavan & Donatien Beguy & Shelley Clark, 2018. "Measuring extended families over time in informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya: Retention and data consistency in a two-round survey," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 38(44), pages 1339-1358.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5443 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Haggerty, Kevin P. & Fleming, Charles B. & Catalano, Richard F. & Petrie, Renee S. & Rubin, Ronald J. & Grassley, Mary H., 2008. "Ten years later: Locating and interviewing children of drug abusers," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-9, February.
    3. Stone Celeste & Scott Leslie & Battle Danielle & Maher Patricia, 2014. "Locating Longitudinal Respondents After a 50-Year Hiatus," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 311-334, June.
    4. John Bryant, 2005. "Children of International Migrants in Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines: A review of evidence and policies," Papers inwopa05/32, Innocenti Working Papers.
    5. Tobler, Amy L. & Komro, Kelli A., 2011. "Contemporary options for longitudinal follow-up: Lessons learned from a cohort of urban adolescents," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 87-96, May.
    6. Blakeslee, Jennifer E. & Del Quest, A. & Powers, Jennifer & Powers, Laurie E. & Geenen, Sarah & Nelson, May & Dalton, Lawrence D. & McHugh, Elizabeth, 2013. "Reaching everyone: Promoting the inclusion of youth with disabilities in evaluating foster care outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 1801-1808.
    7. Williams, Izaak L. & O’Donnell, Clifford R., 2014. "Web-based tracking methods in longitudinal studies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 82-89.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:19:y:2007:i:8:p:1143-1150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.