IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v5y1996i2p129-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection bias in GP fundholding

Author

Listed:
  • Darrin L. Baines
  • David K. Whynes

Abstract

This paper uses a logistic regression model based on 1993 data for general practices in a single Family Health Services Authority (Lincolnshire) to analyse the differences in characteristics between existing fundholding (up to and including wave three) and non‐fundholding practices. A high degree of classification accuracy is obtained. Fundholders are revealed to be more likely than non‐fundholders to meet a number of the various quality criteria laid down by central government following the 1990 National Health Services Act, for example, with respect to prescribing cost control, minor surgery and cervical screening uptake. The model is employed to forecast the fourth wave of fundholding and poor predictions suggest the existence of a structural break in the characteristics of fundholders between those in the first three waves and those of wave four. The evidence presented also supports the existence of selection bias in the first three waves of fundholding, although further logistic regression analysis reveals a form of such bias in the fourth wave also.

Suggested Citation

  • Darrin L. Baines & David K. Whynes, 1996. "Selection bias in GP fundholding," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(2), pages 129-140, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:5:y:1996:i:2:p:129-140
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199603)5:23.0.CO;2-R
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199603)5:23.0.CO;2-R
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199603)5:23.0.CO;2-R?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Javier Salinas-Jimenez & Peter Smith, 1994. "Data envelopment analysis applied to quality in primary health care," Working Papers 124chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    2. Tony Scott & Alan Maynard, 1991. "Will the new GP contract lead to cost effective medical practice?," Working Papers 082chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laudicella, Mauro & Cookson, Richard & Jones, Andrew M. & Rice, Nigel, 2009. "Health care deprivation profiles in the measurement of inequality and inequity: An application to GP fundholding in the English NHS," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1048-1061, December.
    2. Dusheiko, Mark & Gravelle, Hugh & Jacobs, Rowena & Smith, Peter, 2006. "The effect of financial incentives on gatekeeping doctors: Evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 449-478, May.
    3. Giuffrida, Antonio & Gravelle, Hugh & Sutton, Matthew, 2000. "Efficiency and administrative costs in primary care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 983-1006, November.
    4. Mark Dusheiko & Maria Goddard & Hugh Gravelle & Rowena Jacobs, 2006. "Trends in health care commissioning in the English NHS: an empirical analysis," Working Papers 011cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    5. Simoens, Steven & Scott, Anthony, 2005. "Voluntary or compulsory health care reform?: The case of primary care organisations in Scotland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 351-358, June.
    6. Whynes, David K. & Baines, Darrin L., 1998. "Income-based incentives in UK general practice," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 15-31, January.
    7. Dusheiko, Mark & Gravelle, Hugh & Yu, Ning & Campbell, Stephen, 2007. "The impact of budgets for gatekeeping physicians on patient satisfaction: Evidence from fundholding," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 742-762, July.
    8. Mark Dusheiko & Maria Goddard & Hugh Gravelle & Rowena Jacobs, 2008. "Explaining trends in concentration of healthcare commissioning in the English NHS," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(8), pages 907-926, August.
    9. Whynes, David K. & Baines, Darrin L., 2002. "Primary care physicians' attitudes to health care reform in England," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 111-132, May.
    10. Mark Dusheiko & Hugh Gravelle & Rowena Jacobs & Peter C Smith, "undated". "The Effect of Budgets on Doctor Behaviour: Evidence From A Natural Experiment," Discussion Papers 03/04, Department of Economics, University of York.
    11. Gravelle, Hugh & Dusheiko, Mark & Sutton, Matthew, 2002. "The demand for elective surgery in a public system: time and money prices in the UK National Health Service," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 423-449, May.
    12. Karen Bloor & Alan Maynard & Andrew Street, 1999. "The cornerstone of Labour's 'New NHS': reforming primary care," Working Papers 168chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    13. Mark Dusheiko & Hugh Gravelle & Rowena Jacobs, 2004. "The effect of practice budgets on patient waiting times: allowing for selection bias," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(10), pages 941-958, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scott, Anthony & Hall, Jane, 1995. "Evaluating the effects of GP remuneration: problems and prospects," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 183-195, March.
    2. Karen Bloor & Alam Maynard & Andrew Street, 1992. "How much is a doctor worth?," Working Papers 098chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    3. Robert Fleetcroft & Richard Cookson, 2005. "Do the incentive payments in the new NHS contract for primary care reflect likely population health gains?," Working Papers 003cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    4. Karen Bloor & Alan Maynard, 1995. "Equity in primary care," Working Papers 141chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    5. Tsai, P. F. & Mar Molinero, C., 2002. "A variable returns to scale data envelopment analysis model for the joint determination of efficiencies with an example of the UK health service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 21-38, August.
    6. Natasha Palmer & Anne Mills, 2003. "Classical versus relational approaches to understanding controls on a contract with independent GPs in South Africa," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(12), pages 1005-1020, December.
    7. Karen Bloor & Alan Maynard, 1993. "Expenditure on the NHS during and after the Thatcher years: its growth and utilisation," Working Papers 113chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    8. Alan Maynard & Arthur Walker, 1993. "Planning the medical workforce: struggling out of the time warp," Working Papers 105chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    9. Brenda Leese & Mike Drummond & Roger Hawkes, 1994. "Medical technology in general practice in the UK: will fundholding make a difference?," Working Papers 122chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:5:y:1996:i:2:p:129-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.