IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v34y2025i2p246-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unpacking the care‐related quality of life effect of England's publicly funded adult social care. A panel data analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Salas‐Ortiz
  • Francesco Longo
  • Karl Claxton
  • James Lomas

Abstract

Adult Social Care (ASC) is the publicly‐funded long‐term care program in England that provides support with activities of daily living to people experiencing mental and/or physical challenges. Existing evidence suggests that ASC expenditure improves service users' care‐related quality of life (CRQoL). However, less is known about the channels through which this effect exists and the effect on outcomes other than CRQoL. We fill this gap by analyzing survey data on ASC service users who received long‐term support from 2014/15 to 2019/20 using panel data instrumental variable methods. We find that the beneficial impact of ASC expenditure on the CRQoL of both new and existing users is mostly driven by users aged 18–64 without any learning disability and users with no learning disability aged 65 or older receiving community‐based ASC. Moreover, control over daily life, occupation, and social participation are the CRQoL domains that are improved the most. We also find that ASC expenditure has a beneficial effect on several other outcomes beyond CRQoL for both new and existing users including user satisfaction and experience, the ability to carry out activities of daily living independently, whether their home is designed around needs, accessibility to local places, general health, and mental health through reduced anxiety and depression. Greater ASC expenditure, however, does not address the need for other forms of support such as unpaid informal and privately‐funded care.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Salas‐Ortiz & Francesco Longo & Karl Claxton & James Lomas, 2025. "Unpacking the care‐related quality of life effect of England's publicly funded adult social care. A panel data analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 246-266, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:246-266
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.4907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4907
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.4907?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:246-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.