IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v7y2017i2p225-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Injection risk assessment for intra‐formational seal geological model in a carbon sequestration application in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Chi‐Wen Yu
  • Shih‐Chang Lei
  • Chung‐Hui Chiao
  • Lian‐Tong Hwang
  • Wan‐Huei Yang
  • Ming‐Wei Yang

Abstract

As a deep saline aquifer, the Tai‐hsi Foreland Basin in western Taiwan is regarded as an excellent locality to sequester the huge carbon emission from domestic coal‐fired power plants. Existing geological data show that an intra‐formational seal capability characterized by multilayered shale baffles can act as the primary or ultimate cap system. In this study, the relevant ranges of rock parameter of porosity (20∼35%) and permeability (0.0001∼1300 mD), respectively, for the storage layers (sandstone) and seals (shale) have been selected according to large amount of laboratory core test from a nearby pioneering 3000 m drilling and sampling within the southern flank of the Tai‐hsi Basin. Comprehensive geological models considering both homogeneous and heterogeneous cases, and a typical plume migration scenario under a single‐well injection were simulated under a 20‐year continuous injection (1 MtCO 2 per year) followed by post‐injection monitoring up to 1000 years. Corresponding 2D maximum horizontal migration distances (MHMD) of CO 2 plume in the storage reservoir were calculated with respect to a homogeneous reservoir model and its heterogeneous counterparts. In addition, the induced pressures at critical monitoring points were also evaluated and compared. As a consequence, the ubiquitous shale baffles of intra‐formational seal in a heterogeneous saline aquifers were proven to be a successful trapping mechanism controlling the migration distances of lateral and upward movement. Furthermore, safe carbon storage operation within Tai‐hsi Basin with formation depth range about 2135 to 2450 mRT can be ensured by checking statistically the calculated maximum MHMD and the induced pressure magnitude. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi‐Wen Yu & Shih‐Chang Lei & Chung‐Hui Chiao & Lian‐Tong Hwang & Wan‐Huei Yang & Ming‐Wei Yang, 2017. "Injection risk assessment for intra‐formational seal geological model in a carbon sequestration application in Taiwan," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(2), pages 225-240, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:225-240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ghg.1644
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronglei Zhang & Yi Xiong & Philip H. Winterfeld & Xiaolong Yin & Yu‐Shu Wu, 2016. "A novel computational framework for thermal‐hydrological‐mechanical‐chemical processes of CO 2 geological sequestration into a layered saline aquifer and a naturally fractured enhanced geothermal syst," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(3), pages 370-400, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christine Doughty, 2017. "Introduction to the In Focus on simulation of geologic carbon sequestration with the TOUGH codes," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(2), pages 218-219, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weiqiang Song & Hongjian Ni & Ruihe Wang & Mengyun Zhao, 2017. "Wellbore flow field of coiled tubing drilling with supercritical carbon dioxide," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(4), pages 745-755, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:225-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.