IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v5y2015i5p592-602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative assessment of CO 2 storage capacity by using of hydrogeochemical and isotope data for deep saline aquifers

Author

Listed:
  • Yiman Li
  • Zhonghe Pang

Abstract

CO 2 sequestration in deep saline aquifers presents a viable option for CO 2 emissions mitigation while accurate evaluation of CO 2 storage capacity is central to effective site selection. Existing methods are mostly based on consideration of trapping mechanisms, which is problematic in accurate determination of the storage efficiency factor and exposes results to considerable error. Many studies simply adopt DOE figures, which can't represent diverse geological conditions across the globe. A new geochemical‐based method is proposed which considers CO 2 trapping states rather than trapping mechanisms. It is especially effective for site‐scale CO 2 storage capacity calculation with single injection well and a timeframe of a hundred to a thousand years. This method considers injected CO 2 trapped in forms of free state and soluble state, but excludes the mineral trapping state. Effective pore volume is calculated based on two simplified models of CO 2 plume within effective affecting radius in which trigonal pyramidal and cylindrical models represent minimum and maximum volume, respectively. Calculations of free CO 2 saturation and the ratio of dissolved inorganic carbonate contributed by CO 2 dissolution are used to calculate effective CO 2 storage capacity in forms of free and soluble state, respectively. Isotope and hydrogeochemical data changes pre‐ and post‐CO 2 injection are used to calculate free CO 2 saturation and ratio of dissolved inorganic carbonate contributed by CO 2 dissolution. Numerical simulation with calibration by measured values and calculation of CO 2 consumption per unit weight of rock is suggested to assess CO 2 trapped by mineral state at timeframe of tens of thousands years.© 2015 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Suggested Citation

  • Yiman Li & Zhonghe Pang, 2015. "Quantitative assessment of CO 2 storage capacity by using of hydrogeochemical and isotope data for deep saline aquifers," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(5), pages 592-602, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:5:y:2015:i:5:p:592-602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ghg.1505
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Labus, Krzysztof & Bujok, Petr, 2011. "CO2 mineral sequestration mechanisms and capacity of saline aquifers of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin (Central Europe) - Modeling and experimental verification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 4974-4982.
    2. Emberley, S. & Hutcheon, I. & Shevalier, M. & Durocher, K. & Gunter, W.D. & Perkins, E.H., 2004. "Geochemical monitoring of fluid-rock interaction and CO2 storage at the Weyburn CO2-injection enhanced oil recovery site, Saskatchewan, Canada," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1393-1401.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yiman Li & Zhonghe Pang, 2017. "Hydrogeochemical characteristics of deep saline aquifers in sedimentary basins in China and implications for CO 2 geological storage with emphasis on total dissolved solids (TDS) and water type," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 53-64, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mandadige Samintha Anne Perera, 2018. "A Comprehensive Overview of CO 2 Flow Behaviour in Deep Coal Seams," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Zhong, Jinjin & Jiang, Xi, 2017. "A case study of using cosmic ray muons to monitor supercritical CO2 migration in geological formations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1450-1458.
    3. Sreedhar, I. & Vaidhiswaran, R. & Kamani, Bansi. M. & Venugopal, A., 2017. "Process and engineering trends in membrane based carbon capture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 659-684.
    4. Shafaei, Mohammad Javad & Abedi, Jalal & Hassanzadeh, Hassan & Chen, Zhangxin, 2012. "Reverse gas-lift technology for CO2 storage into deep saline aquifers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 840-849.
    5. Li, Pengliang & Liu, Zhenyi & Li, Mingzhi & Zhao, Yao & Li, Xuan & Wan, Song & Ma, Yuanyuan & He, Yanghua, 2021. "Investigation on the limiting oxygen concentration of combustible gas at high pressures and temperatures during oil recovery process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    6. Jie Li & Zhonghe Pang, 2015. "Environmental isotopes in CO 2 geological sequestration," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(4), pages 374-388, August.
    7. Zhang, Fengming & Xu, Chunyan & Zhang, Yong & Chen, Shouyan & Chen, Guifang & Ma, Chunyuan, 2014. "Experimental study on the operating characteristics of an inner preheating transpiring wall reactor for supercritical water oxidation: Temperature profiles and product properties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 577-587.
    8. Zhong, Jie & Wang, Pan & Zhang, Yang & Yan, Youguo & Hu, Songqing & Zhang, Jun, 2013. "Adsorption mechanism of oil components on water-wet mineral surface: A molecular dynamics simulation study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 295-300.
    9. Bo Liu & Fangyuan Zhao & Jinpeng Xu & Yueming Qi, 2019. "Experimental Investigation and Numerical Simulation of CO 2 –Brine–Rock Interactions during CO 2 Sequestration in a Deep Saline Aquifer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Delgado, Montserrat Rodriguez & Arean, Carlos Otero, 2011. "Carbon monoxide, dinitrogen and carbon dioxide adsorption on zeolite H-Beta: IR spectroscopic and thermodynamic studies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 5286-5291.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:5:y:2015:i:5:p:592-602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.