IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v5y2015i5p558-576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the carbon dioxide sequestration in low‐permeability saline aquifers in the Ordos Basin with numerical simulations

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Xie
  • Keni Zhang
  • Litang Hu
  • Yongsheng Wang
  • Maoshan Chen

Abstract

A carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) capture and storage demonstration project was started in 2010 by injecting around 100 000 tonnes of super‐critical CO 2 per annum into a set of very low‐permeability sandstone at depths of more than 1600 m in the northeastern Ordos Basin, China. Based on the site‐specific geology and the observational data, a numerical injection model was developed in order to understand the hydrodynamic behavior of CO 2 in the subsurface for evaluating reservoir performance. The results show that the model reasonably described the spreading of the CO 2 plume. The Triassic Liujiagou sandstone aquifer is the most favorable storage formation for CO 2 sequestration at the site of interest. After three years of injection of CO 2 , the maximum lateral migration distance of CO 2 plume is about 550 m and the pressure build‐up is about 13 MPa in the Liujiagou formation for the actual injection simulation. The major storage layer is at depths of 1690–1699 m, which contributes around 80% of injectivity of the entire reservoir system. The leakage of CO 2 into the geological seals is negligible (>0.1%) over the entire simulation period. Regardless of the relatively good fit during the calibration period, the model overestimated the pressures associated with the injection thereafter. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Xie & Keni Zhang & Litang Hu & Yongsheng Wang & Maoshan Chen, 2015. "Understanding the carbon dioxide sequestration in low‐permeability saline aquifers in the Ordos Basin with numerical simulations," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(5), pages 558-576, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:5:y:2015:i:5:p:558-576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ghg.1499
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghomian, Yousef & Pope, Gary A. & Sepehrnoori, Kamy, 2008. "Reservoir simulation of CO2 sequestration pilot in Frio brine formation, USA Gulf Coast," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1055-1067.
    2. Bob van der Zwaan & Reyer Gerlagh, 2008. "The Economics of Geological CO2 Storage and Leakage," Working Papers 2008.10, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cai Li & Keni Zhang & Chaobin Guo & Jian Xie & Jing Zhao & Xia Li & Federico Maggi, 2017. "Impacts of relative permeability hysteresis on the reservoir performance in CO 2 storage in the Ordos Basin," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(2), pages 259-272, April.
    2. Jafari, Mohammad & Cao, Shuang Cindy & Jung, Jongwon, 2017. "Geological CO2 sequestration in saline aquifers: Implication on potential solutions of China’s power sector," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 137-155.
    3. Li, Yi & Yu, Hao & Li, Yi & Liu, Yaning & Zhang, Guijin & Tang, Dong & Jiang, Zhongming, 2020. "Numerical study on the hydrodynamic and thermodynamic properties of compressed carbon dioxide energy storage in aquifers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1318-1338.
    4. Jun Li & Raheel Ahmed & Xiaochun Li, 2018. "Thermodynamic Modeling of CO 2 -N 2 -O 2 -Brine-Carbonates in Conditions from Surface to High Temperature and Pressure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Yiman Li & Zhonghe Pang, 2017. "Hydrogeochemical characteristics of deep saline aquifers in sedimentary basins in China and implications for CO 2 geological storage with emphasis on total dissolved solids (TDS) and water type," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 53-64, February.
    6. Bing Bai & Xiaochun Li & Haiqing Wu & Yongsheng Wang & Mingze Liu, 2017. "A methodology for designing maximum allowable wellhead pressure for CO 2 injection: application to the Shenhua CCS demonstration project, China," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 158-181, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ren, Bo & Ren, Shaoran & Zhang, Liang & Chen, Guoli & Zhang, Hua, 2016. "Monitoring on CO2 migration in a tight oil reservoir during CCS-EOR in Jilin Oilfield China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 108-121.
    2. Narita, Daiju & Klepper, Gernot, 2015. "Economic incentives for carbon dioxide storage under uncertainty: A real options analysis," Kiel Working Papers 2002, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Claire Alestra & Gilbert Cette & Valérie Chouard & Rémy Lecat, 2024. "How can technology significantly contribute to climate change mitigation?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(41), pages 4925-4937, September.
    4. Soren Lindner & Sonja Peterson & Wilhelm Windhorst, 2010. "An economic and environmental assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) power plants: a case study for the City of Kiel," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(8), pages 1069-1088.
    5. Bob van der Zwaan & Reyer Gerlagh, 2016. "Offshore CCS and ocean acidification: a global long-term probabilistic cost-benefit analysis of climate change mitigation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 157-170, July.
    6. Ma, Lei & Zhou, Lei & Mbadinga, Serge Maurice & Gu, Ji-Dong & Mu, Bo-Zhong, 2018. "Accelerated CO2 reduction to methane for energy by zero valent iron in oil reservoir production waters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 663-671.
    7. Schmidt, Johannes & Leduc, Sylvain & Dotzauer, Erik & Kindermann, Georg & Schmid, Erwin, 2010. "Cost-effective CO2 emission reduction through heat, power and biofuel production from woody biomass: A spatially explicit comparison of conversion technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(7), pages 2128-2141, July.
    8. Lilliestam, Johan & Bielicki, Jeffrey M. & Patt, Anthony G., 2012. "Comparing carbon capture and storage (CCS) with concentrating solar power (CSP): Potentials, costs, risks, and barriers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 447-455.
    9. Matthias Kalkuhl & Ottmar Edenhofer & Kai Lessmann, 2015. "The Role of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Policies for Climate Change Mitigation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 60(1), pages 55-80, January.
    10. Hang Deng & Jeffrey M. Bielicki & Michael Oppenheimer & Jeffrey P. Fitts & Catherine A. Peters, 2017. "Leakage risks of geologic CO2 storage and the impacts on the global energy system and climate change mitigation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 151-163, September.
    11. Schmidt, Johannes & Leduc, Sylvain & Dotzauer, Erik & Schmid, Erwin, 2011. "Cost-effective policy instruments for greenhouse gas emission reduction and fossil fuel substitution through bioenergy production in Austria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3261-3280, June.
    12. Derek Lemoine & Sabine Fuss & Jana Szolgayova & Michael Obersteiner & Daniel Kammen, 2012. "The influence of negative emission technologies and technology policies on the optimal climate mitigation portfolio," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 113(2), pages 141-162, July.
    13. Meier, Felix & Rickels, Wilfried & Quaas, Martin F. & Traeger, Christian, 2022. "Carbon dioxide removal in a global analytic climate economy," Kiel Working Papers 2227, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    14. Hou, Lei & Elsworth, Derek & Zhang, Lei & Gong, Peibin & Liu, Honglei, 2024. "Recalibration of CO2 storage in shale: prospective and contingent storage resources, and capacity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    15. Peter Stigson & Anders Hansson & Mårten Lind, 2012. "Obstacles for CCS deployment: an analysis of discrepancies of perceptions," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 601-619, August.
    16. Grimaud, André & Rouge, Luc, 2014. "Carbon sequestration, economic policies and growth," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 307-331.
    17. García, Jorge H. & Torvanger, Asbjørn, 2019. "Carbon leakage from geological storage sites: Implications for carbon trading," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 320-329.
    18. Sebastiano Cupertino, 2013. "Cost-benefit analysis of carbon dioxide capture and storage considering the impact of two different climate change mitigation regimes," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 73-89.
    19. Jian Xie & Xiaofeng Gou & Jian Guo, 2023. "Assessing a potential site for offshore CO2 storage in the Weixinan Sag in the northwestern Beibu Gulf Basin, northern South China Sea," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 13(1), pages 99-119, February.
    20. Nikolaos Koukouzas & Marina Christopoulou & Panagiota P. Giannakopoulou & Aikaterini Rogkala & Eleni Gianni & Christos Karkalis & Konstantina Pyrgaki & Pavlos Krassakis & Petros Koutsovitis & Dionisio, 2022. "Current CO 2 Capture and Storage Trends in Europe in a View of Social Knowledge and Acceptance. A Short Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-30, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:5:y:2015:i:5:p:558-576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.