IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v4y2014i3p384-399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geochemical sensitivity to CO 2 leakage: detection in potable aquifers at carbon sequestration sites

Author

Listed:
  • Changbing Yang
  • Susan D. Hovorka
  • Michael H. Young
  • Ramon Trevino

Abstract

Various approaches to groundwater monitoring for CO 2 leakage detection and potential impacts of groundwater quality in the above potable aquifers at geological carbon sequestration sites have been reported in literature and briefly reviewed in this study. Although geochemical para‐meters have been proposed as indicators of CO 2 leakage in potable aquifers, assessing sensitivity of geochemical parameters to CO 2 leakage in groundwater is needed. In this study, we present a methodology, using a geochemical model, to simulate responses of aqueous geochemistry to CO 2 leakage into a potable aquifer and then to assess sensitivities of the proposed monitoring geochemical parameters based on their relative changes to initial values. The geochemical model was used to simulate CO 2 leakage into carbonate‐poor and carbonate‐rich aquifers. Results of calculated sensitivities show that dissolved CO 2 and dissolved inorganic carbon in groundwater are most sensitive to CO 2 leakage in all settings. Alkalinity is moderately sensitive, with the best response in the presence of carbonates in the aquifer sediments while groundwater pH shows best response in the aquifer sediments with little carbonates. Impacts of initial (or baseline) groundwater chemistry on sensitivity of geochemical parameters to CO 2 leakage, compared to impacts of aquifer mineralogy, appear to be minor. For monitoring purpose, dissolved CO 2 and dissolved inorganic carbon are better indicators than pH and alkalinity in potable aquifers at geological carbon sequestration sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Changbing Yang & Susan D. Hovorka & Michael H. Young & Ramon Trevino, 2014. "Geochemical sensitivity to CO 2 leakage: detection in potable aquifers at carbon sequestration sites," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 4(3), pages 384-399, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:384-399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ghg.1406
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Changbing Yang & Ramón H. Treviño & Susan D. Hovorka & Jesus Delgado‐Alonso, 2015. "Semi‐analytical approach to reactive transport of CO 2 leakage into aquifers at carbon sequestration sites," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(6), pages 786-801, December.
    2. Yurong Li & Baokai Cheng & Wenge Zhu & Hai Xiao & Runar Nygaard, 2017. "Development and evaluation of the coaxial cable casing imager: a cost‐effective solution to real‐time downhole monitoring for CO 2 sequestration wellbore integrity," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(5), pages 927-941, October.
    3. Yurong Li & Wenge Zhu & Baokai Cheng & Runar Nygaard & Hai Xiao, 2016. "Laboratory evaluation of distributed coaxial cable temperature sensors for application in CO2 sequestration well characterization," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(6), pages 812-823, December.
    4. Changbing Yang & Keith Jamison & Lianqing Xue & Zhenxue Dai & Susan Hovorka & Leif Fredin & Ramón Treviño, 2017. "Quantitative assessment of soil CO 2 concentration and stable carbon isotope for leakage detection at geological carbon sequestration sites," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(4), pages 680-691, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:384-399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.