IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v13y2023i1p3-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Controlling potential far‐field brine leakage from CO2 storage formations using deep extraction wells: Numerical and experimental testing

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad H. Askar
  • Tissa H. Illangasekare

Abstract

Injecting CO2 into deep geologic formations for storage purposes induces large pressure build‐up that risks caprock integrity. Naturally occurring faults or pressure‐induced fractures in the caprock can act as conductive leakage pathways resulting in potential contamination of the overlying shallow aquifers. Previous studies explored using brine extraction to manage such elevated pressure in the storage formation. In this paper, we extended the use of this technique to control far‐field brine leakage. Extraction wells are placed in the storage zone to reduce the leakage flow through reversing the pressure‐gradient locally, while minimizing the brine concentrations in the escaped‐fraction by utilizing the dilution capacity of the overlying formations. The developed approach incorporated the Genetic Algorithm with transport model simulations to optimize well‐placements and extraction‐rates. An approximately 8m long intermediate‐scale tank designed to mimic brine leakage migration in the field was used to validate this approach as field data are not available. We further evaluated the approach numerically using a hypothetical leakage scenario at the Vedder storage formation in San‐Joaquin basin to assess its practicality for field implementation. The results showed that storage zone heterogeneity and fractures’ permeabilities can significantly affect the optimum locations and pumping rates of the extraction wells. Brine leakage can be controlled by extracting a native‐brine volume less than 50% of the injected CO2 volume. The target concentrations in the shallow aquifer determines the extraction rates required to control a leakage through a fracture or a buried thrust fault. The study is useful to develop remediation strategies for carbon storage operations. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad H. Askar & Tissa H. Illangasekare, 2023. "Controlling potential far‐field brine leakage from CO2 storage formations using deep extraction wells: Numerical and experimental testing," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 13(1), pages 3-30, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:3-30
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2194
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.2194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Curtis M. Oldenburg & Abdullah Cihan & Quanlin Zhou & Stacey Fairweather & Lee H. Spangler, 2016. "Geologic carbon sequestration injection wells in overpressured storage reservoirs: estimating area of review," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(6), pages 775-786, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew E. Burton‐Kelly & Nicholas A. Azzolina & Kevin C. Connors & Wesley D. Peck & David V. Nakles & Tao Jiang, 2021. "Risk‐based area of review estimation in overpressured reservoirs to support injection well storage facility permit requirements for CO2 storage projects," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(5), pages 887-906, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:3-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.