IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/finmar/v19y2010i2p63-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geographic Deregulation and Competition in the U.S. Banking Industry

Author

Listed:
  • H. Semih Yildirim
  • Sunil K. Mohanty

Abstract

We examine the effects of geographic deregulation on state‐level competition in U.S. banking markets over the period 1976‐2005. The empirical results confirm that the U.S. banks in general operated under monopolistic competition during the period examined. After partitioning the sample based on bank size we find that the market competition for large banks in Delaware, Oregon, and Rhode Island can be characterized as monopolistic while small banks in Arizona and Massachusetts seem to have operated under the conditions of perfect competition. The removal of geographic restrictions appears to have very limited and non‐uniform effect on state‐level competitive conduct. There is some evidence that the U.S. banking industry might have actually experienced a less competitive behavior in recent years due to increased market power of larger banks.

Suggested Citation

  • H. Semih Yildirim & Sunil K. Mohanty, 2010. "Geographic Deregulation and Competition in the U.S. Banking Industry," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 63-94, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:finmar:v:19:y:2010:i:2:p:63-94
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0416.2010.00155.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0416.2010.00155.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-0416.2010.00155.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:finmar:v:19:y:2010:i:2:p:63-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.