IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/empleg/v8y2011i1p118-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is There a Chinese Common Law? An Empirical Study of the Bilingual Common‐Law System of Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Kwai Hang Ng

Abstract

This study presents results of the first empirical study of the role of Chinese in the newly established bilingual common‐law system of Hong Kong. It considers whether Chinese performs the same role as English in the influential appellate court of Hong Kong. The study examines three facets of civil appeal. First, it asks if civil appeals conducted in Chinese exhibit the same level of legal representation as civil appeals in English. Second, it examines the likelihood of being professionally published among appeal judgments in the two languages. Third, it compares the financial stakes involved in Chinese and English appeals. The results suggest that despite what is stipulated in the Hong Kong Constitution, Chinese plays a marginal role in the higher courts of Hong Kong. There is no substantive development of a Chinese common law in Hong Kong. Instead, the availability of Chinese creates easier but problematic access to the legal system by the public in the form of pro se litigants. The findings also show that the reasons leading to the continued dominance of the English language in Hong Kong are global and social. As such, English is unlikely to be replaced in many postcolonial common‐law systems in the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwai Hang Ng, 2011. "Is There a Chinese Common Law? An Empirical Study of the Bilingual Common‐Law System of Hong Kong," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 118-146, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p:118-146
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01203.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01203.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01203.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kuo‐Chang Huang, 2008. "How Legal Representation Affects Case Outcomes: An Empirical Perspective from Taiwan," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 197-238, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cui Wei & Wang Zhiyuan, 2017. "The Selection of Litigation against Government Agencies: Evidence from China," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(3), pages 1-41, November.
    2. Peter Grajzl & Valentina Dimitrova-Grajzl & Katarina Zajc, 2016. "Inside post-socialist courts: the determinants of adjudicatory outcomes in Slovenian commercial disputes," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 85-115, February.
    3. Claudine Desrieux & Romain Espinosa, 2019. "Case selection and judicial decision-making: evidence from French labor courts," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 57-88, February.
    4. Earnhart, Dietrich & Rousseau, Sandra, 2019. "Are lawyers worth the cost? Legal counsel in environmental criminal court cases," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    5. Yun-chien Chang & Su-hao Tu, 2020. "Two-way selection between flat-fee attorneys and litigants: theoretical and empirical analyses," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 131-164, February.
    6. Lin, Chang-Ching & Chang, Yun-chien & Chen, Kong-Pin, 2020. "Knowledge in youth is wisdom in age: an empirical study of attorney experience in torts litigation," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Rabeea Assy & Tomer Carmel, 2024. "The impact of legal representation in Israeli traffic courts: Addressing selection bias and generalizability problems," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3), pages 532-576, September.
    8. Huang, Kuo-Chang & Chen, Kong-Pin & Lin, Chang-Ching, 2010. "Does the type of criminal defense counsel affect case outcomes?: A natural experiment in Taiwan," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 113-127, June.
    9. David Gliksberg, 2014. "Does the Law Matter? Win Rates and Law Reforms," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 378-407, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p:118-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1740-1461 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.