“They don't let us speak”: Gender, collegiality, and interruptions in deliberations in the Brazilian Supreme Court
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1111/jels.12379
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Ponczek, Vladimir & Grezzana, Stefânia, 2012. "Gender Bias at the Brazilian Superior Labor Court," Brazilian Review of Econometrics, Sociedade Brasileira de Econometria - SBE, vol. 32(1), March.
- Scott W. Desposato & Matthew C. Ingram & Osmar P. Lannes, 2015. "Power, Composition, and Decision Making: The Behavioral Consequences of Institutional Reform on Brazil’s Supremo Tribunal Federal," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 534-567.
- Christina L. Boyd & Lee Epstein & Andrew D. Martin, 2010. "Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(2), pages 389-411, April.
- Kathlene, Lyn, 1994. "Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 88(3), pages 560-576, September.
- Alba Ruibal, 2015. "Social movements and constitutional politics in Latin America: reconfiguring alliances, framings and legal opportunities in the judicialisation of abortion rights in Brazil," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 375-385, October.
- Tali Mendelberg & Christopher F. Karpowitz & Nicholas Goedert, 2014. "Does Descriptive Representation Facilitate Women's Distinctive Voice? How Gender Composition and Decision Rules Affect Deliberation," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(2), pages 291-306, April.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- O’Brien, Diana Z. & Rickne, Johanna, 2016.
"Gender Quotas and Women's Political Leadership,"
American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 110(1), pages 112-126, February.
- O'Brien, Diana C. & Rickne, Johanna, 2014. "Gender Quotas and Women’s Political Leadership," Working Paper Series 1043, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
- Z. O’Brien, Diana & Rickne, Johanna, 2014. "Gender Quotas and Women’s Political Leadership," Working Paper Series, Center for Labor Studies 2014:12, Uppsala University, Department of Economics.
- Xiaohong Yu & Zhaoyang Sun, 2022. "The company they keep: When and why Chinese judges engage in collegiality," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 936-1002, December.
- Chen, Daniel L. & Levonyan, Vardges & Yeh, Susan, 2016.
"Policies Affect Preferences: Evidence from Random Variation in Abortion Jurisprudence,"
IAST Working Papers
16-58, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
- Chen, Daniel L. & Levonyan, Vardges & Yeh, Susan, 2016. "Policies Affect Preferences: Evidence from Random Variation in Abortion Jurisprudence," TSE Working Papers 16-723, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
- Shamena Anwar & Patrick Bayer & Randi Hjalmarsson, 2019.
"Politics in the Courtroom: Political Ideology and Jury Decision Making,"
Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(3), pages 834-875.
- Hjalmarsson, Randi & Anwar, Shamena & Bayer, Patrick, 2015. "Politics in the Courtroom: Political Ideology and Jury Decision Making," CEPR Discussion Papers 10589, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Anwar, Shamena Anwar & Bayer, Patrick & Hjalmarsson, Randi, 2015. "Politics in the Courtroom: Political Ideology and Jury Decision Making," Working Papers in Economics 622, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
- Shamena Anwar & Patrick Bayer & Randi Hjalmarsson, 2015. "Politics in the Courtroom: Political Ideology and Jury Decision Making," NBER Working Papers 21145, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Baskaran, Thushyanthan & Hessami, Zohal, 2022.
"The gender recontest gap in elections,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
- Baskaran, Thushyanthan & Hessami, Zohal, 2021. "The Gender Recontest Gap in Elections," IZA Discussion Papers 14981, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Thushyanthan Baskaran & Zohal Hessami, 2022. "The Gender Recontest Gap in Elections," CESifo Working Paper Series 9655, CESifo.
- Lone Engbo Christiansen & Ms. Huidan Huidan Lin & Ms. Joana Pereira & Petia Topalova & Ms. Rima A Turk, 2016. "Gender Diversity in Senior Positions and Firm Performance: Evidence from Europe," IMF Working Papers 2016/050, International Monetary Fund.
- Richard Holden & Michael Keane & Matthew Lilley, 2021.
"Peer effects on the United States Supreme Court,"
Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), pages 981-1019, July.
- Richard Holden & Michael Keane & Matthew Lilley, 2017. "Peer Effects on the United States Supreme Court," Economics Papers 2017-W02, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
- Richard Holden & Michael Keane & Matthew Lilley, 2019. "Peer Effects on the United States Supreme Court," Discussion Papers 2019-01, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
- Richard Holden & Michael Keane & Matthew Lilley, 2020. "Peer Effects on the United States Supreme Court," Discussion Papers 2019-01b, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
- Migheli, Matteo, 2022. "Lost in election. How different electoral systems translate the voting gender gap into gender representation bias," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
- Fałkowski, Jan & Lewkowicz, Jacek, 2021. "Are Adjudication Panels Strategically Selected? The Case of Constitutional Court in Poland," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
- Chen, Daniel L., 2016.
"Priming Ideology: Why Presidential Elections Affect U.S. Judges,"
TSE Working Papers
16-681, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Aug 2016.
- Chen, Daniel L., 2016. "Priming Ideology: Why Presidential Elections Affect U.S. Judges," IAST Working Papers 16-39, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST), revised Aug 2016.
- Pierre Bentata & Romain Espinosa & Yolande Hiriart, 2019.
"Correction Activities by France’s Supreme Courts and Control over their Dockets,"
Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 129(2), pages 169-204.
- Pierre Bentata & Romain Espinosa & Yolande Hiriart, 2019. "Correction Activities by France’s Supreme Courts and Control over their Dockets," Post-Print halshs-02167246, HAL.
- Gretchen Ritter & Nicole Mellow, 2000. "The State of Gender Studies in Political Science," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 571(1), pages 121-134, September.
- Christoph Engel, 2024. "The German Constitutional Court – Activist, but not Partisan?," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2024_04, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
- Thomas J. Miles, 2012. "Racial Disparities in Wiretap Applications before Federal Judges," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(2), pages 419-458.
- Tilko Swalve, 2022. "Does Group Familiarity Improve Deliberations in Judicial Teams? Evidence from the German Federal Court of Justice," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 223-249, March.
- Samantha Bielen & Wim Marneffe & Peter Grajzl & Valentina Dimitrova-Grajzl, 2018.
"The Duration of Judicial Deliberation: Evidence from Belgium,"
Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 174(2), pages 303-333, June.
- Samantha Bielen & Wim Marneffe & Peter Grajzl & Valentina Dimitrova-Grajzl, 2016. "The Duration of Judicial Deliberation: Evidence from Belgium," CESifo Working Paper Series 5947, CESifo.
- Robert S. Erikson, 2022. "Appellate court assignments as a natural experiment: Gender panel effects in sex discrimination cases," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 423-446, June.
- Matthew Dahl & Devan N. Patel & Matthew E. K. Hall, 2021. "The Dogma Within? Examining Religious Bias in Private Title VII Claims," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 742-764, December.
- Andrzej Baranski & D.J. da Cunha Batista Geraldes & Ada Kovaliukaite & James Tremewan, 2021.
"Experiment on Gender Representation in Majoritarian Bargaining,"
Working Papers
2102, Utrecht School of Economics.
- Baranski, Andrzej & Geraldes, Diogo & Kovaliukaite, Ada & Tremewan, James, 2022. "An experiment on gender representation in majoritarian bargaining," MPRA Paper 113063, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Andrzej Baranski Author e-mail: a.baranski@nyu.edu & Diogo Geraldes Author e-mail: diogogeraldes@gmail.com & Ada Kovaliukaite Author e-mail: ada.kovaliukaite@nyu.edu & James Tremewan Author e-mail: ja, 2021. "An Experiment on Gender Representation in Majoritarian Bargaining," Working Papers 20210060, New York University Abu Dhabi, Department of Social Science, revised Sep 2021.
- Barros, Henrique M., 2021. "Neither at the cutting edge nor in a patent-friendly environment: Appropriating the returns from innovation in a less developed economy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:21:y:2024:i:1:p:174-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1740-1461 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.