IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/empleg/v17y2020i3p438-465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Working Hard or Making Work? Plaintiffs’ Attorney Fees in Securities Fraud Class Actions

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen J. Choi
  • Jessica Erickson
  • A. C. Pritchard

Abstract

In this article, we study attorney fees awarded in the largest securities class actions: “mega‐settlements.” Consistent with prior work, we find larger fee awards but lower percentages in these cases. We also find that courts are more likely to reject or modify fee requests made in connection with the largest settlements. We conjecture that this scrutiny provides an incentive for law firms to bill more hours, not to advance the case, but to help justify large fee awards—“make work.” The results of our empirical tests are consistent with plaintiffs’ attorneys investing more time in litigation against larger companies, with the largest potential damages, particularly when there are multiple lead counsel firms. We find a similar pattern with relative efficiency, with more hours per docket entry for the largest‐stake cases with multiple lead counsel firms. Overall, our results suggest that plaintiffs’ attorneys are receiving windfall fee awards in at least some mega‐settlement cases at shareholders’ expense.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen J. Choi & Jessica Erickson & A. C. Pritchard, 2020. "Working Hard or Making Work? Plaintiffs’ Attorney Fees in Securities Fraud Class Actions," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 438-465, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:438-465
    DOI: 10.1111/jels.12262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12262
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jels.12262?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theodore Eisenberg & Geoffrey P. Miller, 2010. "Attorney Fees and Expenses in Class Action Settlements: 1993–2008," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 248-281, June.
    2. Theodore Eisenberg & Geoffrey P. Miller, 2004. "Attorney Fees in Class Action Settlements: An Empirical Study," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 27-78, March.
    3. Michael Perino, 2012. "Institutional Activism Through Litigation: An Empirical Analysis of Public Pension Fund Participation in Securities Class Actions," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 368-392, June.
    4. Stephen J. Choi, 2011. "Motions for Lead Plaintiff in Securities Class Actions," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(1), pages 205-244.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Fenn & Neil Rickman, 2011. "Fixing Lawyers' Fees Ex Ante: A Case Study in Policy and Empirical Legal Studies," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(3), pages 533-555, September.
    2. Allen Huang & Kai Wai Hui & Reeyarn Zhiyang Li, 2019. "Federal Judge Ideology: A New Measure of Ex Ante Litigation Risk," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 431-489, May.
    3. Michael Heise, 2016. "Assessing Assessments of Israel's 2006 Class Action Law," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 172(1), pages 108-112, March.
    4. Alberto Cassone & Giovanni Ramello, 2011. "The simple economics of class action: private provision of club and public goods," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 205-224, October.
    5. Ingo Vogelsang & Nishal Ramphal & Stephen Carroll & Nicholas Pace, 2007. "An economic analysis of consumer class actions in regulated industries," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 87-104, August.
    6. Theodore Eisenberg & Christoph Engel, 2014. "Assuring Civil Damages Adequately Deter: A Public Good Experiment," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 301-349, June.
    7. Blakeley B. McShane & Oliver P. Watson & Tom Baker & Sean J. Griffith, 2012. "Predicting Securities Fraud Settlements and Amounts: A Hierarchical Bayesian Model of Federal Securities Class Action Lawsuits," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 482-510, September.
    8. Sophie Harnay & Alain Marciano, 2011. "Seeking rents through class actions and legislative lobbying: a comparison," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 293-304, October.
    9. Matter, Ulrich & Stutzer, Alois, 2014. "The Role of Lawyer-Legislators in Shaping the Law: Evidence from Voting Behavior on Tort Reforms," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100452, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    10. Wang, Yong & Mao, Connie X., 2015. "Shareholder activism of public pension funds: The political facet," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 138-152.
    11. Thomas Ulen, 2011. "An introduction to the law and economics of class action litigation," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 185-203, October.
    12. Stephen J. Choi & Drew T. Johnson‐Skinner & A. C. Pritchard, 2011. "The Price of Pay to Play in Securities Class Actions," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(4), pages 650-681, December.
    13. Fang Fang & Wang Tian & Zhang Yanfei, 2023. "Test on the law protection of minority investors in China: Perspective of misrepresentation in securities market," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(3), pages 1642-1655, April.
    14. Demirkan, Sebahattin & Fuerman, Ross D., 2014. "Auditor litigation: Evidence that revenue restatements are determinative," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 164-174.
    15. Giorgio Rampa & Margherita Saraceno, 2023. "Conjectures and underpricing in repeated mass disputes with heterogeneous plaintiffs," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 1-32, June.
    16. Liu, Chelsea, 2021. "CEO gender and employee relations: Evidence from labor lawsuits," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    17. Krishnan, C.N.V. & Solomon, Steven Davidoff & Thomas, Randall S., 2017. "The impact on shareholder value of top defense counsel in mergers and acquisitions litigation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 480-495.
    18. Lucia Dalla Pellegrina & Margherita Saraceno, 2016. "Can Shareholder Litigation Discipline CEO Bonuses in the Financial Sector? The Role of Securities Class Actions," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 45(1), pages 3-36, February.
    19. Gurvan Branellec & Ji-Yong Lee, 2018. "Faut-il introduire en France une class action d'actionnaires (Securities Class Actions) ?," Post-Print hal-01894300, HAL.
    20. Eric Helland & Jonathan Klick, 2007. "The Effect of Judicial Expedience on Attorney Fees in Class Actions," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(1), pages 171-187, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:438-465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1740-1461 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.