IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/empleg/v13y2016i4p567-602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Predicates of Military Detention at Guantánamo: The Role of Individual Acts and Affiliations

Author

Listed:
  • Aziz Z. Huq

Abstract

The military detentions at Guantánamo have provoked intense controversy. Judges, legislators, and military officials disagree sharply about the scope of detention authority. To date, little is known about the granular determinants of decisions to transfer detainees from custody at the Cuban base or to prolong their detention. This article exploits a novel data set of classified documents disclosed by the Wikileaks organization to explore two questions now dividing officials, legislators, and judges. First, what are the detainee actions and affiliations that predict longer detentions? Second, what is the relationship between a determination that a detainee committed certain acts and the further inference of affiliation with a proscribed terrorist organization? These inquiries isolate both continuities and divergences from the law “on the books.”

Suggested Citation

  • Aziz Z. Huq, 2016. "The Predicates of Military Detention at Guantánamo: The Role of Individual Acts and Affiliations," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 567-602, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:13:y:2016:i:4:p:567-602
    DOI: 10.1111/jels.12126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12126
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jels.12126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giacomo Chiozza & H. E. Goemans, 2004. "International Conflict and the Tenure of Leaders: Is War Still Ex Post Inefficient?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(3), pages 604-619, July.
    2. Keele, Luke, 2010. "Proportionally Difficult: Testing for Nonproportional Hazards in Cox Models," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 189-205, April.
    3. Sunhee Park & David J. Hendry, 2015. "Reassessing Schoenfeld Residual Tests of Proportional Hazards in Political Science Event History Analyses," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(4), pages 1072-1087, October.
    4. Licht, Amanda A., 2011. "Change Comes with Time: Substantive Interpretation of Nonproportional Hazards in Event History Analysis," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 227-243, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas König & Lars Mäder, 2013. "Non-conformable, partial and conformable transposition: A competing risk analysis of the transposition process of directives in the EU15," European Union Politics, , vol. 14(1), pages 46-69, March.
    2. Kotorri Mrika, 2017. "The probability of return conditional on migration duration: evidence from Kosovo," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 35-46, December.
    3. Yuleng Zeng, 2021. "Biding time versus timely retreat: Asymmetric dependence, issue salience, and conflict duration," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(4), pages 719-733, July.
    4. Paulo Reis Mourao & Alina Irina Popescu, 2021. "Discussing the political survival of Romanian ministers since 1989—Do economic conditions matter?," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 63-93, January.
    5. Clayton L. Thyne, 2006. "Cheap Signals with Costly Consequences," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 50(6), pages 937-961, December.
    6. Ly, Kim Cuong & Liu, Hong & Opong, Kwaku, 2017. "Who acquires whom among stand-alone commercial banks and bank holding company affiliates?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 144-158.
    7. Jun Koga Sudduth, 2021. "Who Punishes the Leader? Leader Culpability and Coups during Civil War," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(2-3), pages 427-452, February.
    8. Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou & Ali Zamani & Abbas Barabadi & Mahdi Mokhberdoran, 2021. "Resilience Assessment: A Performance-Based Importance Measure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Matthew O. Jackson & Massimo Morelli, 2007. "Political Bias and War," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(4), pages 1353-1373, September.
      • Jackson, Matthew O. & Morelli, Massimo, "undated". "Political bias and war," Working Papers 1247, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
    10. Corinne Bara, 2018. "Legacies of Violence," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 62(9), pages 1991-2016, October.
    11. Adam, Antonis & Tsavou, Evi, 2020. "One strike and you’re out! Dictators’ fate in the aftermath of terrorism," MPRA Paper 103772, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2020.
    12. Jeff Carter, 2017. "The Political Cost of War Mobilization in Democracies and Dictatorships," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(8), pages 1768-1794, September.
    13. Gandrud, Christopher, 2015. "simPH: An R Package for Illustrating Estimates from Cox Proportional Hazard Models Including for Interactive and Nonlinear Effects," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 65(i03).
    14. M. Daniel Brannock & Robert F. Chew & Alexander J. Preiss & Emily C. Hadley & Signe Redfield & Julie A. McMurry & Peter J. Leese & Andrew T. Girvin & Miles Crosskey & Andrea G. Zhou & Richard A. Moffi, 2023. "Long COVID risk and pre-COVID vaccination in an EHR-based cohort study from the RECOVER program," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Michael Horowitz & Rose McDermott & Allan C. Stam, 2005. "Leader Age, Regime Type, and Violent International Relations," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 49(5), pages 661-685, October.
    16. Kyle Haynes, 2017. "Diversionary conflict: Demonizing enemies or demonstrating competence?," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(4), pages 337-358, July.
    17. Tansey, Oisin & Koehler, Kevin & Schmotz, Alexander, 2017. "Ties to the rest: autocratic linkages and regime survival," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 50(9), pages 1221-1254.
    18. Francisco Pino & Jordi Vidal-Robert, "undated". "Habemus Papam? Polarization and Conflict in the Papal States," Working Papers wp492, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    19. Michelle R. Garfinkel, 2010. "Political Institutions and War Initiation: The Democratic Peace Hypothesis Revisited," Working Papers 101107, University of California-Irvine, Department of Economics.
    20. Mourao, Paulo Reis, 2018. "Surviving in the shadows—An economic and empirical discussion about the survival of the non-winning F1 drivers," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 54-68.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:13:y:2016:i:4:p:567-602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1740-1461 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.