IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/emetrp/v87y2019i4p1391-1396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strong Duality in Monopoly Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Kleiner
  • Alejandro Manelli

Abstract

The main result in Daskalakis, Deckelbaum, and Tzamos (2017) establishes strong duality in the monopoly problem with an argument based on transportation theory. We provide a short, alternative proof using linear programming.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Kleiner & Alejandro Manelli, 2019. "Strong Duality in Monopoly Pricing," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1391-1396, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:87:y:2019:i:4:p:1391-1396
    DOI: 10.3982/ECTA15735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA15735
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3982/ECTA15735?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bikhchandani, Sushil & Mishra, Debasis, 2022. "Selling two identical objects," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Dizdar, Deniz & Kováč, Eugen, 2020. "A simple proof of strong duality in the linear persuasion problem," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 407-412.
    3. Robert J. McCann & Kelvin Shuangjian Zhang, 2023. "A duality and free boundary approach to adverse selection," Papers 2301.07660, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    4. Michael J. Curry & Zhou Fan & David C. Parkes, 2024. "Optimal Automated Market Makers: Differentiable Economics and Strong Duality," Papers 2402.09129, arXiv.org.
    5. Alexander V. Kolesnikov & Fedor Sandomirskiy & Aleh Tsyvinski & Alexander P. Zimin, 2022. "Beckmann's approach to multi-item multi-bidder auctions," Papers 2203.06837, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:87:y:2019:i:4:p:1391-1396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.