IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/crtinf/v3y2023i2p61-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges to Implementing Microreactor Technologies in Rural and Tribal Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Hillary K. Fishler
  • Nahuel Guaita
  • Dawn D. Davis
  • Joshua D. Fishler

Abstract

Microreactors are an emergent technology providing nuclear‐powered energy production facilities that boast portability, modularity, robust operational capacity, and carbon‐free baseload electricity generation. While the exact operational and maintenance requirements are currently unclear, most platforms aim to have similar features, such as minimal required operational staff, portability via standard shipping vectors, and high availability factors. Proposed areas for deployment include remote military installations, community disaster relief and recovery operations, and electricity resource supplementation in rural communities, among others. Successful deployment would secure critical, vulnerable infrastructures, and alleviate resource scarcity in historically disadvantaged communities. Rural and Tribal communities are uniquely poised to benefit due to increased vulnerability to—and disproportionately negative outcomes caused by—power disruptions, infrastructure gaps, and critical service disruptions. However, successful deployment to these areas will depend on the careful consideration of current barriers, opportunities, and unique impacts of energy transitions to the respective local communities; as such, implementation and technology must be considered jointly. As microreactors have not been widely studied in multiscale policy spheres, nor as a typical context for emergent technologies, this article will examine existing regulatory scope, energy infrastructure, ecological capacity, natural resource impacts, and community buy‐in as a measure of a community's adoption capability for this technology. Using the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) Framework introduced by Elinor Ostrom, we will provide a context for micro‐ and meso‐scale adoption of this technology that is reliant on the nested federal political, social, economic, and regulatory climate surrounding the use of nuclear technology, microreactors, and their deployment to address climate change and its associated needs at the local scale. We will address municipal, county, state, and Tribal perspectives; current policies; and ongoing efforts, as well as ecological and social costs associated with transition to a carbon‐free national energy position.

Suggested Citation

  • Hillary K. Fishler & Nahuel Guaita & Dawn D. Davis & Joshua D. Fishler, 2023. "Challenges to Implementing Microreactor Technologies in Rural and Tribal Communities," Journal of Critical Infrastructure Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), pages 61-91, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:crtinf:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:61-91
    DOI: 10.18278/jcip.3.2.7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.18278/jcip.3.2.7
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18278/jcip.3.2.7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hilary S. Boudet, 2019. "Public perceptions of and responses to new energy technologies," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(6), pages 446-455, June.
    2. John Downer, 2014. "Disowning Fukushima: Managing the credibility of nuclear reliability assessment in the wake of disaster," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(3), pages 287-309, September.
    3. Jonas Hagmann, 2012. "Fukushima: probing the analytical and epistemological limits of risk analysis," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(7), pages 801-815, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Łukasz Jarosław Kozar & Robert Matusiak & Marta Paduszyńska & Adam Sulich, 2022. "Green Jobs in the EU Renewable Energy Sector: Quantile Regression Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Eid Gul & Giorgio Baldinelli & Pietro Bartocci, 2022. "Energy Transition: Renewable Energy-Based Combined Heat and Power Optimization Model for Distributed Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Hübner, Gundula & Leschinger, Valentin & Müller, Florian J.Y. & Pohl, Johannes, 2023. "Broadening the social acceptance of wind energy – An Integrated Acceptance Model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. Liuyang Yao & Qian Zhang & Kin Keung Lai & Xianyu Cao, 2020. "Explaining Local Residents’ Attitudes toward Shale Gas Exploitation: The Mediating Roles of Risk and Benefit Perceptions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2022. "Homes of the future: Unpacking public perceptions to power the domestic hydrogen transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    6. Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene & Dalia Streimikiene & Giulio Paolo Agnusdei & Tomas Balezentis, 2023. "Energy-space concept for the transition to a low-carbon energy society," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(12), pages 14953-14973, December.
    7. John C. Pierce & Rachel M. Krause & Sarah L. Hofmeyer & Bonnie J. Johnson, 2021. "Explanations for Wind Turbine Installations: Local and Global Environmental Concerns in the Central Corridor of the United States?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-11, September.
    8. Phimsupha Kokchang & Yuan Zhao & Suthirat Kittipongvises, 2023. "Understanding Citizens’ Perceptions and Attitudes toward Energy Restructuring under China’s NDC for Quality of Life: A Case of Linfen City," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(5), pages 566-576, September.
    9. Badr Eddine Lebrouhi & Eric Schall & Bilal Lamrani & Yassine Chaibi & Tarik Kousksou, 2022. "Energy Transition in France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-28, May.
    10. Whiston, Michael M. & Lima Azevedo, Inês M. & Litster, Shawn & Samaras, Constantine & Whitefoot, Kate S. & Whitacre, Jay F., 2021. "Paths to market for stationary solid oxide fuel cells: Expert elicitation and a cost of electricity model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    11. Lisa Diamond & Alexander Mirnig & Peter Fröhlich, 2023. "Encouraging Trust in Demand-Side Management via Interaction Design: An Automation Level Based Trust Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-31, March.
    12. Emma Uebelhor & Olivia Hintz & Sarah B. Mills & Abigail Randall, 2021. "Utility-Scale Solar in the Great Lakes: Analyzing Community Reactions to Solar Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Ulf J. J. Hahnel & Christian Mumenthaler & Tobia Spampatti & Tobias Brosch, 2020. "Ideology as Filter: Motivated Information Processing and Decision-Making in the Energy Domain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Pedersen, Jaap & Weinand, Jann Michael & Syranidou, Chloi & Rehfeldt, Daniel, 2024. "An efficient solver for large-scale onshore wind farm siting including cable routing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(2), pages 616-630.
    15. Milchram, Christine & Künneke, Rolf & Doorn, Neelke & van de Kaa, Geerten & Hillerbrand, Rafaela, 2020. "Designing for justice in electricity systems: A comparison of smart grid experiments in the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    16. Emily Grubert, 2023. "Yellow, red, and brown energy: leveraging water footprinting concepts for decarbonizing energy systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 7239-7260, July.
    17. Wu, Zezhou & He, Qiufeng & Li, Jiarun & Bi, Guoqiang & Antwi-Afari, Maxwell Fordjour, 2023. "Public attitudes and sentiments towards new energy vehicles in China: A text mining approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    18. Nytte, Sharon & Navrud, Ståle & Alfnes, Frode, 2024. "Social acceptance of new floating offshore wind power: Do attitudes towards existing offshore industries matter?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    19. Liu, Wenjuan & Agusdinata, Datu B. & Eakin, Hallie & Romero, Hugo, 2022. "Sustainable minerals extraction for electric vehicles: A pilot study of consumers’ perceptions of impacts," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    20. Meghna Mukherjee & Konrad Posch & Santiago J. Molina & Ken Taymor & Ann Keller, 2023. "Comparing regulatory processes in genome editing and autonomous vehicles: How institutional environments shape sociotechnical imaginaries," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(3), pages 433-457, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:crtinf:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:61-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2693-3101 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.