IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i2p2710-2727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Equality in Sustainability Reporting: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Lucy Ojeda
  • Matías Ginieis
  • Eleni Papaoikonomou

Abstract

Gender equality is one of the Sustainable Development Goals and companies are key actors that need to disclose any progress made towards this goal. But we lack a clear understanding of the specifics of gender equality reporting in previous empirical research. We conducted a systematic literature review of empirical articles until year 2022 in the Web of Science and Scopus databases following the PRISMA guidelines. We found that most studies that examine gender equality reporting in companies usually do not follow a specific set of reporting guidelines and that the indicators employed are often limited to diversity in the highest governance body and committees, women in leadership and workforce gender representation. Also, we observed a lack of methodological diversity in previous studies. As a result, we have identified several gaps and propose various research lines to further advance research in the field. Additionally, we suggest policy and managerial implications to accelerate the growth of gender‐sensitive reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucy Ojeda & Matías Ginieis & Eleni Papaoikonomou, 2025. "Gender Equality in Sustainability Reporting: A Systematic Literature Review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 2710-2727, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:2:p:2710-2727
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.3089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3089
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.3089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:2:p:2710-2727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.