IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i2p2664-2680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Reliable Is Environmental Management in Mining? Learnings Through Analysis of Sustainability Reports

Author

Listed:
  • Layla Howe
  • Susan Johnston
  • Claire Côte

Abstract

Environmental failures associated with mining operations are persistent issues. It is therefore surprising that we still know very little about whether companies are taking the organisational steps necessary to reliably achieve acceptable environmental performance. Companies use sustainability reports to describe their progress towards fulfilling environmental commitments. This study examines sustainability reports published by seven of the largest mining companies through the lens of High Reliability Organisation (HRO) theory and considers what those reports reveal about the reliability of mining company environmental activities. We conclude the extent to which environmental management practices align with HRO characteristics cannot be determined with certainty from sustainability reports. The data does suggest an insufficient embedding of environmental management in organisational collective mindsets, as well as other significant gaps in the application of HRO hallmark characteristics to environmental activities. Alternative data sources need to be explored to determine the reliability of environmental management in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Layla Howe & Susan Johnston & Claire Côte, 2025. "How Reliable Is Environmental Management in Mining? Learnings Through Analysis of Sustainability Reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 2664-2680, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:2:p:2664-2680
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.3085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3085
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.3085?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:2:p:2664-2680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.