IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i1p647-660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Of shepherds and sheep: Who sets the agenda for firms' attention to social issues?

Author

Listed:
  • Ronei Leonel
  • Jae Hwan Lee
  • Elise Perrault

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility has received much attention regarding how it can benefit firms and why firms voluntarily address social issues. However, little is known about the problems to which firms choose to pay attention and what influences these decisions. We combine the attention‐based view of the firm and media agenda‐setting theories to propose that firms address the most prominent social issues as determined by the media. We analyze the frequency of 64 social issues in the CSR reports of 258 firms from 2006 to 2016 for a total sample of 86,208 issue‐firm‐year observations. We find that the salience of the problems in traditional media influences the social issues firms address in their CSR reports, and over time, the agenda‐setting effect of traditional media on firms has increased, solidifying traditional media's role as curators of social issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronei Leonel & Jae Hwan Lee & Elise Perrault, 2025. "Of shepherds and sheep: Who sets the agenda for firms' attention to social issues?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 647-660, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:647-660
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.2979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2979
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.2979?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:647-660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.