IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i1p341-356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Apologize or deny? How companies defend legitimacy of Wall street, Main street, and Market street after corporate misconduct

Author

Listed:
  • Marc Oberhauser
  • Marcus Conrad
  • Dirk Holtbrügge

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze which measures corporations use to defend legitimacy after conducting misconduct and how different stakeholders react to these legitimacy‐defending measures (LDMs). Drawing on legitimacy theory and the concept of thought worlds, we derive hypotheses for three stakeholder groups and two types of corporate misconduct (CM): social‐ and environmental‐related CM and product‐ and service‐related CM. These hypotheses are tested in a sample of 343 cases of CM. Data for these CM were hand‐collected from various corporate publications, newspapers, and websites. We find that investors, customers, and society respond differently to different LDMs and different types of CM. The study contributes a stakeholder‐ and CM‐differentiated approach to legitimacy theory and adds to the literature on corporate misconduct, corporate legitimacy, and stakeholder management.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc Oberhauser & Marcus Conrad & Dirk Holtbrügge, 2025. "Apologize or deny? How companies defend legitimacy of Wall street, Main street, and Market street after corporate misconduct," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 341-356, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:341-356
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.2951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2951
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.2951?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:341-356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.