IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i1p212-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Floodlight or spotlight? Public attention and corporate social responsibility decoupling

Author

Listed:
  • Ling He
  • Shengdao Gan

Abstract

Recently, there has been a surge of criticism against corporate social responsibility (CSR) decoupling due to its detrimental implications for both business and society. Thus, reducing this disconnect and fostering the consistency between firms' talk and walk has become an urgent priority. We employ a fixed‐effects model to examine the impact of public attention on CSR decoupling using 5633 annual observations from Chinese A‐share listed firms spanning 2011–2020. Our results show that firms subjected to heightened public attention tend to engage less in CSR decoupling. Further dividing into “greenwashing” and “brownwashing” types, we discover that public attention significantly curbs the occurrence of “greenwashing” decoupling. Channel tests indicate that public attention effectively inhabits CSR decoupling through information and supervision channels. We also document that a lower level of CSR decoupling for firms with intensive public attention results in lower reputational crisis and superior financial performance, highlighting the benefits of aligning CSR talk with CSR walk. These findings provide evidence supporting the imperative role of public oversight in curbing corporate misconduct and contribute to the ongoing scholarly debate on CSR decoupling.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling He & Shengdao Gan, 2025. "Floodlight or spotlight? Public attention and corporate social responsibility decoupling," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 212-233, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:212-233
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.2950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2950
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.2950?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:212-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.