IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i1p138-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The moderating role of investor sentiments between sustainability reporting and firm reputation. Evidence from Chinese listed firms

Author

Listed:
  • Zain Ul Abideen

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between sustainability reporting, investor sentiments, and firm reputation in the Chinese stock market. Utilizing panel data from 2018 to 2023 on non‐financial A‐share firms in China, this study employs OLS regression and advanced techniques to ensure robustness, including tests for heteroskedasticity and addressing endogeneity concerns through 2SLS, and potentially the two‐step GMM approach. Analysis exhibits a positive relationship between sustainability reporting, investor sentiments, and firm reputation. Strong sustainability practices correlate with more positive investor sentiment and enhanced firm reputation, aligning with sustainable development principles. Limitations include the restricted data timeframe, suggesting broader insights could be gained by extending the analysis period. Additionally, the study's focus on brand equity as a metric for reputation may overlook other facets. Future research could explore alternative reputation metrics and measurement methods. Integrating environmental, social, and governance reporting into corporate strategies can drive long‐term value creation and sustainable development, offering actionable insights for policymakers, investors, and corporate decision‐makers. This study contributes unique insights into how sustainability reporting influences investor sentiment and firm reputation within the Chinese stock market context, leveraging the SR framework and focusing on firms in China, thus providing valuable perspectives on a dynamic market.

Suggested Citation

  • Zain Ul Abideen, 2025. "The moderating role of investor sentiments between sustainability reporting and firm reputation. Evidence from Chinese listed firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 138-159, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:138-159
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.2943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2943
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.2943?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:138-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.