IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i1p1042-1059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the CSR‐luxury paradox: The duality of luxury and responsibility in consumer perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Yanqi Sun
  • Tianxiang Mai
  • Cheng Xu

Abstract

This article delves into the intricate dynamics between luxury businesses' environmental responsibility initiatives and consumer perceptions, grounded in the theory of reasoned action. Utilizing three experimental studies, this article explores the interplay of corporate social responsibility (CSR) message framing (responsibility‐focused vs. dignity‐focused) and the nature of the luxury business (established vs. entrepreneurial). Study 1 examines the interaction between luxury brand type and CSR message framing, revealing that responsibility‐focused narratives enhance consumer interest in entrepreneurial brands but not in established ones. Study 2 investigates the psychological mechanisms underlying these effects, finding that dignity‐focused narratives increase consumer engagement through perceived authenticity and alignment with self‐image. Study 3 employs longitudinal field research to track actual buying behaviors, showing that dignity‐focused messages significantly boost spending, brand loyalty, and satisfaction, particularly for entrepreneurial brands. The findings illuminate the nuanced consumer reactions to CSR initiatives, underscoring the importance of message framing and brand nature in shaping luxury consumption attitudes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanqi Sun & Tianxiang Mai & Cheng Xu, 2025. "Understanding the CSR‐luxury paradox: The duality of luxury and responsibility in consumer perceptions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 1042-1059, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:1042-1059
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.2999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2999
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.2999?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:1042-1059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.