IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v11y2004i2p103-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategies for sustainable development: use of a benchmarking tool to understand relative strengths and weaknesses and identify best practice

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Hemming
  • Shirley Pugh
  • Geraint Williams
  • Deborah Blackburn

Abstract

This paper will describe the development and application of a methodology for assessing the progress being made by companies in addressing the challenges of sustainable development. The methodology is based on the identification of a number of attributes that provide indicators of progress in pursuit of sustainable development. Each attribute is then further described in terms of several key characteristics. Publicly available information from leading companies can then be analysed in terms of these attributes and characteristics and each company's relative progress can be assessed. The methodology has been applied to a number of leading companies. The companies were chosen to cover a range of different sectors and by reference to relevant indicators, including the Dow Jones Sustainability Index and the FTSE4Good. An initial study carried out in 2000 was repeated during 2002. The results can be used to identify the relative strengths and weaknesses of a particular company versus best practice in its sector and overall, and to show the progress that has been made by individual companies and by sectors between 2000 and 2002. The paper will present some illustrative results from the studies. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Hemming & Shirley Pugh & Geraint Williams & Deborah Blackburn, 2004. "Strategies for sustainable development: use of a benchmarking tool to understand relative strengths and weaknesses and identify best practice," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 103-113, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:11:y:2004:i:2:p:103-113
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.58
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.58?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura Laguna-Salvadó & Matthieu Lauras & Uche Okongwu & Tina Comes, 2019. "A multicriteria Master Planning DSS for a sustainable humanitarian supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1303-1343, December.
    2. Gallardo-Vázquez, Dolores & Sánchez-Hernández, María Isabel & Corchuelo-Martinez-Azua, María Beatriz, 2013. "Validación de un instrumento de medida para la relación entre la orientación a la responsabilidad social corporativa y otras variables estratégicas de la empresa," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 11-23.
    3. Mariëtte van Huijstee & Pieter Glasbergen, 2008. "The practice of stakeholder dialogue between multinationals and NGOs," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(5), pages 298-310, September.
    4. Hens Runhaar & Helene Lafferty, 2009. "Governing Corporate Social Responsibility: An Assessment of the Contribution of the UN Global Compact to CSR Strategies in the Telecommunications Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 479-495, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:11:y:2004:i:2:p:103-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.