IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v7y1990i1p227-251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditor independence judgments: A cognitive†developmental model and experimental evidence

Author

Listed:
  • LAWRENCE A. PONEMON
  • DAVID R.L. GABHART

Abstract

. This paper describes a psychological framework that examines auditors' conceptions of independence in the context of ethical cognition. An experimental study of independence judgments of 119 partners and managers in two national public accounting firms is reported. Using a well†known measure of ethical cognition, this study examines auditors' implicit reasoning in the resolution of an independence paradigm. The most significant are that (1) a systematic relationship between auditors' measured ethical cognition and their resolution of an independence conflict exists, (2) the penalty attribute is a much stronger influence than the affiliation attribute on the auditors' ethical resolve, and (3) the cognitive measure used in this study can be used efficiently to explain priority rankings of a majority of independence attributes developed in earlier research. Résumé. Les auteurs décrivent ici une grille psychologique permettant d'analyser la façon dont les vérificateurs conçoivent l'impartialité dans le contexte de la conscience éthique. Ils font état des résultats d'une étude expérimentale des jugements d'impartialité de 119 associés et chefs de groupe attachés à deux cabinets d'experts†comptables nationaux. Utilisant une mesure bien connue de la conscience éthique, les auteurs ana†lysent le raisonnement implicite des vérificateurs dans la résolution d'un paradigme d'impartialité. Les principaux résultats de l'étude sont les suivants: 1) il existe une relation systématique entre la conscience éthique mesurée chez les vérificateurs et la façon dont ils résolvent un problème d'impartialité, 2) l'attribut « sanction » a sur la décision éthique des vérificateurs une influence beaucoup plus grande que l'attribut « affiliation » et 3) la mesure cognitive utilisée dans cette étude est efficace dans l'explication des classements de la plupart des attributs d'impartialité définis dans le travaux de recherche antérieurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence A. Ponemon & David R.L. Gabhart, 1990. "Auditor independence judgments: A cognitive†developmental model and experimental evidence," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 227-251, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:7:y:1990:i:1:p:227-251
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1990.tb00812.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1990.tb00812.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1990.tb00812.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antle, R, 1984. "Auditor Independence," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 1-20.
    2. Joyce, Ej & Biddle, Gc, 1981. "Are Auditors Judgments Sufficiently Regressive," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 323-349.
    3. Lavin, David, 1977. "Some effects of the perceived independence of the auditor," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 237-244, June.
    4. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor independence, `low balling', and disclosure regulation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 113-127, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yves Mard & Christelle Chaplais & Sylvain Marsat, 2014. "De la possibilité d'accroître l'éthique de l'auditeur : Le cas d'une formation," Post-Print hal-01899102, HAL.
    2. Nguyen, Thi Tuyet Mai, 2017. "An examination of independent directors in Vietnam," OSF Preprints ay6dv, Center for Open Science.
    3. Nurul Nazlia Jamil, 2020. "The Power of Political Connections: Review on the Impacts of Audit Committee and Corporate Governance," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 333347-3333, December.
    4. Christelle Chaplais & Yves Mard & Sylvain Marsat, 2016. "The auditor facing ethical dilemnas: the impact of an ethical training on the compliance with deontological code [L'auditeur face aux dilemmes éthiques : L'impact d'une formation à l'éthique sur la," Post-Print hal-02156617, HAL.
    5. Muhammad Irdam Ferdiansah & Vincent K. Chong & Isabel Z. Wang & David R. Woodliff, 2023. "The Effect of Ethical Commitment Reminder and Reciprocity in the Workplace on Misreporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(2), pages 325-345, August.
    6. Jeffrey R. Cohen & Gregory M. Trompeter, 1998. "An Examination of Factors Affecting Audit Practice Development," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 481-504, December.
    7. Lawrence A. Ponemon, 1992. "Auditor underreporting of time and moral reasoning: An experimental lab study," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 171-189, September.
    8. Lawrence A. Ponemon, 1992. "La sous†évaluation du temps de travail et le raisonnement moral chez les vérificateurs: laboratoire expérimental," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 190-211, September.
    9. Tabea Franziska Hirth-Goebel & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2019. "Management accountants and ethical dilemmas: How to promote ethical intention?," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 287-322, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Atasi Basu & Randal Elder & Mohamed Onsi, 2012. "Reported earnings, auditor's opinion, and compensation: theory and evidence," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 29-48, March.
    2. Svanberg, Jan & Öhman, Peter & Neidermeyer, Presha E., 2019. "Auditor objectivity as a function of auditor negotiation self-efficacy beliefs," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 121-131.
    3. Jeffrey W. Schatzberg & Galen R. Sevcik, 1994. "A Multiperiod Model and Experimental Evidence of Independence and “Lowballing†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 137-174, June.
    4. Sweeney, John T. & Roberts, Robin W., 1997. "Cognitive moral development and auditor independence," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(3-4), pages 337-352.
    5. Barry E. Cushing, 1990. "Discussion of “Auditor independence judgments: A cognitive†developmental model and experimental evidenceâ€," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 252-260, September.
    6. Christopher Bleibtreu & Ulrike Stefani, 2012. "The Interdependence Between Audit Market Structure and the Quality of Financial Reporting: The Case of Non-Audit Services," Working Paper Series of the Department of Economics, University of Konstanz 2012-01, Department of Economics, University of Konstanz.
    7. Gary S. Monroe & NG Juliana & Andrew J. Wellington, 1992. "Limiting Auditors‘ Liability: The Potential Consequences," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 1(4), pages 16-26, November.
    8. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2013_013 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Hwang, Seokyoun & Sarath, Bharat & Han, Seung-youb, 2022. "Auditor independence: The effect of auditors’ quality control efforts and corporate governance," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    10. Habib, Ahsan, 2011. "Audit firm industry specialization and audit outcomes: Insights from academic literature," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 114-129.
    11. Alzoubi, Ebraheem Saleem Salem, 2018. "Audit quality, debt financing, and earnings management: Evidence from Jordan," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 69-84.
    12. Adam Esplin & Karim Jamal & Shyam Sunder, 2018. "Demand for and Assessment of Audit Quality in Private Companies," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(3), pages 319-352, September.
    13. Angelo Baglioni & Luca Colombo, 2009. "Managers’ Compensation And Misreporting: A Costly State Verification Approach," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 47(2), pages 278-289, April.
    14. Sadok Mansour, 2007. "Modelisation Du Risque Dans Les Methodologies D'Audit : Apport Des De La Psychometrie," Post-Print halshs-00543217, HAL.
    15. James Routledge & David Morrison, 2012. "Insolvency administration as a strategic response to financial distress," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 37(3), pages 441-459, December.
    16. Jennifer R. Joe & Scott D. Vandervelde, 2007. "Do Auditor†Provided Nonaudit Services Improve Audit Effectiveness?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 467-487, June.
    17. Saeid Nouri & Behnam Gilaninia, 2017. "The Effect of Surplus Free Cash Flow and Audit Quality on Earnings Management," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 270-275.
    18. Danielle E. Warren & Miguel Alzola, 2009. "Ensuring Independent Auditors: Increasing the Saliency of the Professional Identity," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 41-56, January.
    19. Barnes, Paul, 2013. "The effects on financial statements of the litigation cost rule in a civil action for negligence against the auditor," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 170-182.
    20. Chen, Anthony & Duong, Hong & Ngo, Anh, 2019. "Types of nonaudit service fees and earnings response coefficients in the post-sarbanes-oxley era," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 132-147.
    21. Melinda Timea FULOP & Nicolae MAGDAS & George Silviu CORDOS, 2019. "Theoretical Background Of Internal And External Environment Of Negotiation," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(21), pages 1-3.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:7:y:1990:i:1:p:227-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.