IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v37y2020i4p2224-2256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Interplay of Core and Peripheral Actors in the Trajectory of an Accounting Innovation: Insights from beyond Budgeting

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian D. Becker
  • Martin Messner
  • Utz Schäffer

Abstract

Previous studies on accounting innovations emphasize the key role played by innovators and other core actors in theorizing and popularizing such innovations. This paper extends this literature by drawing attention to the role of actors who occupy a more peripheral position within the innovation‐based field. We regard accounting innovations as strategic action fields, in which core and peripheral actors interact to shape the trajectory of the innovation. In contrast to core actors, peripheral actors only weakly identify with the innovation‐based field and often occupy a core position in some other industry, professional, and/or geographical field. Given their embeddedness in these other fields, they are likely to try to accommodate an innovation with existing practices. Such frame blending can be problematic for core actors who envisage a more radical frame shift. Using the case of Beyond Budgeting, we show how the interplay between core and peripheral actors shapes the trajectory of an innovation, in terms of the composition of the field and the framing tactics that dominate at different stages in the development of the field. Our paper advances a perspective on accounting innovations which highlights the variable nature of the innovation space, in terms of different actors entering and exiting this space over time, as well as the importance of considering the overlaps between an innovation‐based field and other (industry, professional, geographical) fields. L'interaction des acteurs principaux et périphériques dans la trajectoire de l'innovation en comptabilité : Perspectives issues de l'approche Beyond Budgeting Des études antérieures sur les innovations comptables mettent l'accent sur le rôle clé joué par les innovateurs et les autres acteurs principaux pour théoriser et vulgariser ces innovations. La présente étude contribue à cette littérature en attirant l'attention sur le rôle des acteurs qui se situent en périphérie du champ d'innovation. Nous considérons les innovations comptables comme des champs d'action stratégiques dans lesquels les acteurs principaux et les acteurs périphériques interagissent pour façonner la trajectoire des innovations. Contrairement aux acteurs principaux, les acteurs périphériques ne s'identifient pas vraiment comme faisant partie du champ d'innovation et occupent souvent une position clé dans un autre champ industriel, professionnel ou géographique. Compte tenu de leur appartenance à ces autres secteurs, les acteurs périphériques sont susceptibles d'essayer de s'adapter à une innovation en ayant recours à des pratiques existantes. Une telle combinaison structurelle peut se révéler problématique pour les acteurs principaux qui envisagent un changement structurel plus radical. En nous appuyant sur l'approche « Beyond Budgeting » (« au‐delà du budget »), nous montrons de quelle façon l'interaction entre les acteurs principaux et les acteurs périphériques définissent la trajectoire d'une innovation, sur le plan de la composition du champ ainsi que des tactiques de structuration qui prévalent à diverses étapes du développement du champ. Notre étude présente une perspective sur les innovations comptables qui fait ressortir le caractère variable de l'espace d'innovation quant aux différents acteurs qui entrent dans cet espace et en sortent au fil du temps, ainsi que l'importance de la prise en compte des chevauchements entre le champ d'innovation et les autres champs (industriels, professionnels, géographiques).

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian D. Becker & Martin Messner & Utz Schäffer, 2020. "The Interplay of Core and Peripheral Actors in the Trajectory of an Accounting Innovation: Insights from beyond Budgeting," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 2224-2256, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:37:y:2020:i:4:p:2224-2256
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12593
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3846.12593?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastian Becker, 2014. "When Organizations Deinstitutionalize Control Practices: A Multiple-Case Study of Budget Abandonment," Working Papers hal-02058257, HAL.
    2. Hélène Giroux, 2006. "‘It Was Such a Handy Term’: Management Fashions and Pragmatic Ambiguity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(6), pages 1227-1260, September.
    3. Ahrens, Thomas & Chapman, Christopher S., 2006. "Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: Positioning data to contribute to theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 819-841, November.
    4. Gosselin, Maurice, 1997. "The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 105-122, February.
    5. Power, Michael, 2015. "How accounting begins: object formation and the accretion of infrastructure," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64324, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Colwyn Jones, T. & Dugdale, David, 2002. "The ABC bandwagon and the juggernaut of modernity," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(1-2), pages 121-163.
    7. Simon Alcouffe & Nicolas Berland & Yves Levant, 2003. "Les facteurs de diffusion des innovations managériales en comptabilité et contrôle de gestion : une étude comparative," ACCRA, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 9(3), pages 7-26.
    8. Sarah Kaplan, 2008. "Framing Contests: Strategy Making Under Uncertainty," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(5), pages 729-752, October.
    9. Katarina Østergren & Inger Stensaker, 2011. "Management Control without Budgets: A Field Study of 'Beyond Budgeting' in Practice," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 149-181.
    10. Julie Battilana, 2011. "The Enabling Role of Social Position in Diverging from the Institutional Status Quo: Evidence from the UK National Health Service," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 817-834, August.
    11. Furusten, Staffan, 2009. "Management consultants as improvising agents of stability," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 264-274, September.
    12. Wallander, Jan, 1999. "Budgeting -- an unnecessary evil," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 405-421, December.
    13. Malmi, Teemu, 1999. "Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(8), pages 649-672, November.
    14. Pimsiri Chiwamit & Sven Modell & Chun Lei Yang, 2014. "The societal relevance of management accounting innovations: economic value added and institutional work in the fields of Chinese and Thai state-owned enterprises," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 144-180, April.
    15. Covaleski, Mark A. & Dirsmith, Mark W., 1988. "The use of budgetary symbols in the political arena: An historically informed field study," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    16. Yves Levant & Simon Alcouffe & Nicolas Berland, 2008. "Actor-networks and the diffusion of management accounting innovations : a comparative study," Post-Print hal-01682216, HAL.
    17. Sven Modell, 2019. "Constructing institutional performance: a multi-level framing perspective on performance measurement and management," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 428-453, June.
    18. Yves Levant & Nicolas Berland & Simon Alcouffe, 2003. "Les facteurs de diffusion des innovations managériales en comptabilité et contrôle de gestion : une étude comparative," Post-Print hal-01681060, HAL.
    19. Simon Alcouffe & Nicolas Berland & Yves Levant, 2003. "Les facteurs de diffusion des innovations managériales en comptabilité et contrôle de gestion : une étude comparative," Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 9(3), pages 7-26.
    20. Gibassier, Delphine, 2017. "From écobilan to LCA: The elite’s institutional work in the creation of an environmental management accounting tool," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 36-58.
    21. Modell, Sven & Vinnari, Eija & Lukka, Kari, 2017. "On the virtues and vices of combining theories: The case of institutional and actor-network theories in accounting research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 62-78.
    22. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1094 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Sebastian D. Becker, 2014. "When Organisations Deinstitutionalise Control Practices: A Multiple-Case Study of Budget Abandonment," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 593-623, December.
    24. Modell, Sven & Yang, ChunLei, 2018. "Financialisation as a strategic action field: An historically informed field study of governance reforms in Chinese state-owned enterprises," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 41-59.
    25. Power, Michael, 2015. "How accounting begins: Object formation and the accretion of infrastructure," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 43-55.
    26. Sebastian D. Becker, 2014. "When Organisations Deinstitutionalise Control Practices: A Multiple-Case Study of Budget Abandonment," Post-Print hal-01097586, HAL.
    27. Yang, ChunLei & Modell, Sven, 2015. "Shareholder orientation and the framing of management control practices: A field study in a Chinese state-owned enterprise," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robson, Keith & Ezzamel, Mahmoud, 2023. "The cultural fields of accounting practices: Institutionalization and accounting changes beyond the organization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Rodney Coyte & Martin Messner & Shan Zhou, 2022. "The revival of zero‐based budgeting: drivers and consequences of firm‐level adoptions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3147-3188, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodney Coyte & Martin Messner & Shan Zhou, 2022. "The revival of zero‐based budgeting: drivers and consequences of firm‐level adoptions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3147-3188, September.
    2. Simon Alcouffe & Jonathan Maurice & Nadine Galy & Loïc Gate, 2019. "Is the limited diffusion of management accounting innovations really a paradox? A meta-analysis of the relationship between product diversity and the adoption of Activity-Based Costing [La faible d," Post-Print hal-02124677, HAL.
    3. Staci A. Kenno & Michelle C. Lau & Barbara J. Sainty, 2018. "In Search of a Theory of Budgeting: A Literature Review," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 507-553, December.
    4. Mareike Bergmann & Christian Brück & Thorsten Knauer & Anja Schwering, 2020. "Digitization of the budgeting process: determinants of the use of business analytics and its effect on satisfaction with the budgeting process," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 25-54, April.
    5. Gibassier, Delphine, 2017. "From écobilan to LCA: The elite’s institutional work in the creation of an environmental management accounting tool," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 36-58.
    6. Hanen Moalla, 2006. "La diffusion de la méthode ABC en Tunisie," Post-Print halshs-00548107, HAL.
    7. Habib Mahama & Zhichao (Alex) Wang, 2023. "Impact of the interactive and diagnostic uses of performance measurement systems on procedural fairness perception, cooperation and performance in supply alliances," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3253-3296, September.
    8. Zelinschi Dragoş, 2009. "Genèse Et Évolutions D'Une Innovation : La Méthode Abc," Post-Print halshs-00460128, HAL.
    9. Fasshauer, Ingrid, 2012. "Les interactions entre contrôle et stratégie : redéfinition du rôle des cadres intermédiaires et du levier interactif de contrôle," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/11150 edited by Berland, Nicolas.
    10. Vassili Joannides, 2011. "La gestion sans budget ou l'alignement de la finance sur la stratégie," Post-Print hal-00650532, HAL.
    11. Tarek Chanegrih, 2010. "Les changements en contrôle de gestion - quelle nature et quelles finalités?," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 13(1), pages 5-32, March.
    12. Modell, Sven & Yang, ChunLei, 2018. "Financialisation as a strategic action field: An historically informed field study of governance reforms in Chinese state-owned enterprises," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 41-59.
    13. Simon Alcouffe & Pierre Mévellec, 2012. "Analyse de la littérature sur l'ABC et proposition d'une taxinomie," Post-Print hal-00936600, HAL.
    14. Tiina Henttu-Aho, 2018. "The role of rolling forecasting in budgetary control systems: reactive and proactive types of planning," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 327-360, December.
    15. Graaf, Johan & Kraus, Kalle & Strömsten, Torkel, 2022. "The problematics of financialization – On the important (but neglected) horizontal axis of organizational action," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Eric Maton & Dragos Zelinschi, 2012. "La Diffusion Des Innovations Manageriales En Controle De Gestion, Une Approche Rhetorique," Post-Print hal-00691178, HAL.
    17. Reilley, Jacob & Löhlein, Lukas, 2023. "Theorizing (and) the future of interdisciplinary accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    18. Li, Xinxiang & Soobaroyen, Teerooven, 2021. "Accounting, Ideological and Political Work and Chinese multinational operations: A neo-Gramscian perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    19. Bhimani, Alnoor & Sivabalan, Prabhu & Soonawalla, Kazbi, 2018. "A study of the linkages between rolling budget forms, uncertainty and strategy," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 306-323.
    20. Sophie Hoozée & Falconer Mitchell, 2018. "Who Influences the Design of Management Accounting Systems? An Exploratory Study," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(3), pages 374-390, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:37:y:2020:i:4:p:2224-2256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.