IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v26y2009i2p393-402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussion of "Mandatory Audit Partner Rotation, Audit Quality, and Market Perception: Evidence from Taiwan"

Author

Listed:
  • E. Michael Bamber
  • Linda Smith Bamber

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Michael Bamber & Linda Smith Bamber, 2009. "Discussion of "Mandatory Audit Partner Rotation, Audit Quality, and Market Perception: Evidence from Taiwan"," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 393-402, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:26:y:2009:i:2:p:393-402
    DOI: 10.1506/car.26.2.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1506/car.26.2.3
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1506/car.26.2.3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Singh, Harjinder & Sultana, Nigar & Islam, Ariful & Singh, Abhijeet, 2022. "Busy auditors, financial reporting timeliness and quality," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(3).
    2. Alessandro Mechelli & Riccardo Cimini, 2017. "Do (Audit Firm and Key Audit Partner) Rotations Affect Value Relevance? Empirical Evidence from the Italian Context," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 143-152, January.
    3. Singh, Abhijeet & Singh, Harjinder & Sultana, Nigar & Evans, John, 2019. "Independent and joint effects of audit partner tenure and non-audit fees on audit quality," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 186-205.
    4. Arslan-Ayaydin, Özgür & Chen, Shimin & Ni, Serene Xu & Thewissen, James, 2022. "Is cross-listing a panacea for improving earnings quality? The case of H- and B-share firms in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Zhang, Xuehua & Yan, Huanmin & Hu, Fang & Wang, Hongjian & Li, Xiaoning, 2022. "Effect of auditor rotation violation on audit opinions and audit fees: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    6. Tikkos Sitanggang & Titik Aryati & Bambang Pamungkas & Sukrisno Agoes, 2022. "The role of the audit committee to increase the influence of audit quality and internal control on earnings management," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 29(1), pages 399-418, March.
    7. Beatriz García Osma & Belén Gill de Albornoz Noguer & Elena De las Heras Cristobal, 2016. "Opinion shopping: Partner versus firm-level evidence," Working Papers. Serie EC 2016-02, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    8. Chen, Lihong & Xiao, Tingting & Zhou, Jia, 2023. "Do auditor changes affect the disclosure of critical audit matters? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    9. Lijing Tong & Bin Wu & Min Zhang, 2023. "Local Gambling Attitudes and Audit Quality: Evidence from Audit Adjustments," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 59(1), pages 381-410, March.
    10. Neal Arthur & Medhat Endrawes & Shawn Ho, 2017. "Impact of Partner Change on Audit Quality: An Analysis of Partner and Firm Specialisation Effects," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(4), pages 368-381, December.
    11. Zhang, Min & Xu, Haoran & Li, Xu, 2017. "The Effect of Previous Working Relationship between Rotating Partners on Mandatory Audit Partner Rotation," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 101-121.
    12. Lucidi, Francesco Simone & Semmler, Willi, 2022. "Supervisory shocks to banks' credit standards and their macroeconomic impact," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:26:y:2009:i:2:p:393-402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.