IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v22y2005i1p55-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of R&D Intensity on Demand for Specialist Auditor Services

Author

Listed:
  • JAYNE M. GODFREY
  • JANE HAMILTON

Abstract

The audit fee research literature argues that auditors' costs of developing brand name reputations, including top†tier designation and recognition for industry specialization, are compensated through audit fee premiums. Audited firms reduce agency costs by engaging high†quality auditors who monitor the levels and reporting of discretionary expenditures and accruals. In this study we examine whether specialist auditor choice is associated with a particular discretionary expenditure †research and development (R&D). For a large sample of U.S. companies from a range of industries, we find strong evidence that R&D intensity is positively associated with firms' choices of auditors who specialize in auditing R&D contracts. Additionally, we find that R&D intensive firms tend to appoint top†tier auditors. We use simultaneous equations to control for interrelationships between dependent variables in addition to single†equation ordinary least squares (OLS) and logistic regression models. Our results are particularly strong in tests using samples of small firms whose auditor choice is not constrained by the need to appoint a top†tier auditor to ensure the auditor's financial independence from the client.

Suggested Citation

  • Jayne M. Godfrey & Jane Hamilton, 2005. "The Impact of R&D Intensity on Demand for Specialist Auditor Services," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 55-93, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:22:y:2005:i:1:p:55-93
    DOI: 10.1506/P9FJ-EKAL-FPJQ-CM9N
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1506/P9FJ-EKAL-FPJQ-CM9N
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1506/P9FJ-EKAL-FPJQ-CM9N?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sihai Li & Yi Quan & Gary Gang Tian & Kun Tracy Wang & Stella Huiying Wu, 2022. "Academy fellow independent directors and innovation," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 103-148, March.
    2. Rani Hoitash & Udi Hoitash & Ari Yezegel, 2021. "Can sell-side analysts’ experience, expertise and qualifications help mitigate the adverse effects of accounting reporting complexity?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 859-897, October.
    3. Nguyen, Lily & Vu, Le & Yin, Xiangkang, 2020. "The undesirable effect of audit quality: Evidence from firm innovation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    4. Fang Sun & Fengyun Wu, 2023. "The Impact Of Debt Structure On Auditorchoice," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 15(2), pages 105-115.
    5. Datta, Sudip & Gruskin, Mark & Iskandar-Datta, Mai, 2024. "Auditor certification and long-run performance of IPO stocks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Chen, Shenglan & Lin, Bingxuan & Lu, Rui & Ma, Hui, 2016. "Pay for accounting performance and R&D investment: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 142-153.
    7. Lee, Eugenia Y. & Ha, Wonsuk & Park, Sunyoung, 2023. "Auditor specialization in R&D and clients’ R&D investment-q sensitivity," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2).
    8. Huasheng Gao & Huai Zhang & Jin Zhang, 2018. "Employee turnover likelihood and earnings management: evidence from the inevitable disclosure doctrine," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1424-1470, December.
    9. Reheul, Anne-Mie & Van Caneghem, Tom & Verbruggen, Sandra, 2011. "Auditor choice in the Belgian nonprofit sector: a behavioral perspective," Working Papers 2011/36, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
    10. Jong†Hag Choi & T. J. Wong, 2007. "Auditors' Governance Functions and Legal Environments: An International Investigation," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 13-46, March.
    11. Zenghui Liu & Bo Ouyang & Xiaojie (Christine) Sun, 2015. "CEO Power and Auditor Choice," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 4(4), pages 44-51, October.
    12. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    13. Li-Jen He & Jianxiong Chen, 2021. "Does Mandatory Audit Partner Rotation Influence Auditor Selection Strategies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Mahdi Salehi & Grzegorz Zimon & Hayder Adnan Hashim & Ryszard Jędrzejczak & Adam Sadowski, 2022. "Accounting Quality and Audit Attributes on the Stock Price Crashes in an Emerging Market," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    15. Huai Zhang & Jin Zhang, 2023. "Political corruption and accounting choices," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3-4), pages 443-481, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:22:y:2005:i:1:p:55-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.