IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v18y2001i4p693-696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Comparing Residual Income and Discounted Cash Flow Models of Equity Valuation: A Response to Penman 2001 (CAR, Winter 2001)

Author

Listed:
  • Russell J. Lundholm
  • Terrence B. O'Keefe

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Russell J. Lundholm & Terrence B. O'Keefe, 2001. "On Comparing Residual Income and Discounted Cash Flow Models of Equity Valuation: A Response to Penman 2001 (CAR, Winter 2001)," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 693-696, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:18:y:2001:i:4:p:693-696
    DOI: 10.1506/Y51R-C3YF-MT0T-BWE2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1506/Y51R-C3YF-MT0T-BWE2
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1506/Y51R-C3YF-MT0T-BWE2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen H. Penman, 2001. "On Comparing Cash Flow and Accrual Accounting Models for Use in Equity Valuation: A Response to Lundholm and O'Keefe (CAR, Summer 2001)," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 681-692, December.
    2. Stephen H. Penman & Theodore Sougiannis, 1998. "A Comparison of Dividend, Cash Flow, and Earnings Approaches to Equity Valuation," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 343-383, September.
    3. Russell Lundholm & Terry O'Keefe, 2001. "Reconciling Value Estimates from the Discounted Cash Flow Model and the Residual Income Model," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 311-335, June.
    4. Francis, J & Olsson, P & Oswald, DR, 2000. "Comparing the accuracy and explainability of dividend, free cash flow, and abnormal earnings equity value estimates," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 45-70.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fernandez, Pablo, 2003. "Three residual income valuation methods and discounted cash flow valuation," IESE Research Papers D/487, IESE Business School.
    2. Philip Brown & Gerry Gallery & Olivia Goei, 2006. "Does market misvaluation help explain share market long‐run underperformance following a seasoned equity issue?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 46(2), pages 191-219, June.
    3. Gordon Richardson & Surjit Tinaikar, 2004. "Accounting based valuation models: what have we learned?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 44(2), pages 223-255, July.
    4. Cheng Lai, 2020. "A Note on a Framework for Valuation Ratios Based on Fundamentals," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 2213-2223, December.
    5. Echterling, F. & Eierle, B. & Ketterer, S., 2015. "A review of the literature on methods of computing the implied cost of capital," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 235-252.
    6. Kuo, Chen-Yin, 2016. "Does the vector error correction model perform better than others in forecasting stock price? An application of residual income valuation theory," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 772-789.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcel Ausloos, 2020. "Valuation Models Applied to Value-Based Management—Application to the Case of UK Companies with Problems," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Budi Frensidy & Ryan Joshua Pelealu & Robiyanto Robiyanto, 2020. "Analysis of Equity Valuation Models and Target Price Accuracy: An Evidence From Analyst Reports in Indonesia," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    3. Jack Stecher & Mark Atten, 2015. "Using Brouwer’s continuity principle to pick stocks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 225(1), pages 161-171, February.
    4. Khaled Aljifri & Hafiz Imtiaz Ahmad, 2019. "Preferred Valuation Techniques in the UAE: A Comparative Study of Financial and Nonfinancial Sectors," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 51-59.
    5. Marc Deloof & Wouter De Maeseneire & Koen Inghelbrecht, 2009. "How Do Investment Banks Value Initial Public Offerings (IPOs)?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1‐2), pages 130-160, January.
    6. Emanuel Bagna & Grazia Dicuonzo & Andrea Perrone & Vittorio Dell’Atti, 2017. "The value relevance of brand valuation," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(58), pages 5865-5876, December.
    7. Stephen H. Penman, 2001. "On Comparing Cash Flow and Accrual Accounting Models for Use in Equity Valuation: A Response to Lundholm and O'Keefe (CAR, Summer 2001)," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 681-692, December.
    8. Imam, Shahed & Chan, Jacky & Shah, Syed Zulfiqar Ali, 2013. "Equity valuation models and target price accuracy in Europe: Evidence from equity reports," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 9-19.
    9. Schröder, David, 2005. "The Implied Equity Risk Premium: An Evaluation of Empirical Methods," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 13/2005, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    10. Echterling, F. & Eierle, B. & Ketterer, S., 2015. "A review of the literature on methods of computing the implied cost of capital," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 235-252.
    11. Peter Roosenboom, 2007. "How Do Underwriters Value Initial Public Offerings? An Empirical Analysis of the French IPO Market," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 1217-1243, December.
    12. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4142 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Karel Janda, 2019. "Earnings Stability and Peer Company Selection for Multiple Based Indirect Valuation," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 69(1), pages 37-75, February.
    14. I-Cheng Yeh & Che-hui Lien, 2017. "Growth and value hybrid valuation model based on mean reversion," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(50), pages 5092-5116, October.
    15. Gentry, James A. & Whitford, David T. & Sougiannis, Theodore & Aoki, Shigeo, 2002. "Do Accounting Earnings or Free Cash Flows Provide a Better Estimate of Capital Gain Rates of Return on Stocks?," Working Papers 02-0111, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    16. Kuo, Chen-Yin, 2016. "Does the vector error correction model perform better than others in forecasting stock price? An application of residual income valuation theory," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 772-789.
    17. Fernandez, Pablo, 2003. "Equivalence of ten different methods for valuing companies by cash flow discounting," IESE Research Papers D/524, IESE Business School.
    18. Jeremiah Green & John R. M. Hand & X. Frank Zhang, 2016. "Errors and questionable judgments in analysts’ DCF models," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 596-632, June.
    19. Fernandez, Pablo, 2003. "Three residual income valuation methods and discounted cash flow valuation," IESE Research Papers D/487, IESE Business School.
    20. Alex Kim & Maximilian Muhn & Valeri Nikolaev, 2024. "Financial Statement Analysis with Large Language Models," Papers 2407.17866, arXiv.org.
    21. Holger Daske & Günther Gebhardt, 2006. "Zukunftsorientierte Bestimmung von Risikoprämien und Eigenkapitalkosten für die Unternehmensbewertung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 530-551, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:18:y:2001:i:4:p:693-696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.