IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v10y1993i1p211-226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management Compensation Surrounding an Accounting Change and Long†Term Construction Projects

Author

Listed:
  • RAMACHANDRAN RAMANAN
  • BALA V. BALACHANDRAN

Abstract

. This paper examines empirically the unexpected compensation to the top managers of a sample of 45 firms that voluntarily changed to capitalizing interest on long†term construction projects during the time period 1966–1974. The cash compensation to top management increased starting the year of the accounting change compared to that of top management for a firm in the same industry of similar size. Further, a comparison of the capital expenditure per dollar of sales between the sample and a pair†matched set of firms expensing interest in the same industry suggests that the long†term construction project was not taken up by diverting funds from routine capital expenditures. Collectively, the results are consistent with an inference that the managers were rewarded in the short term for a set of actions with expected future benefits in the long term. The accounting change, which may have facilitated the expansion, appears embedded in such a set of actions. Résumé. Les auteurs procèdent à l'examen empirique de la rétribution inattendue que reçoivent les cadres supérieurs sur un échantillon de 45 entreprises qui sont passées volontairement à la capitalisation des intérêts dans leurs projets de construction à long terme au cours de la période s'échelonnant de 1966 à 1974. La rétribution en espèces versée aux cadres supérieurs de ces entreprises a augmenté, à partir de l'année de la modification de la méthode comptable, par rapport à la rétribution versée à la haute direction entreprises de taille similaire appartenant au même secteur d'activité. En outre, une comparaison des dépenses en immobilisations par dollar de chiffre d'affaires entre les entreprises de l'échantillon et leurs homologues du même secteur d'activité ayant opté pour l'imputation des intérêts à l'exercice a révélé que les projets de construction à long terme n'étaient pas financés à même les crédits ordinairement réservés aux dépenses en immobilisations. Dans l'ensemble, les résultats confirment le raisonnement selon lequel les gestionnaires ont été rétribués à court terme pour un ensemble d'actions dont les avantages futurs prévus se manifesteront à long terme. La modification comptable, qui peut avoir facilité l'expansion, semble inscrite dans cet ensemble d'actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramachandran Ramanan & Bala V. Balachandran, 1993. "Management Compensation Surrounding an Accounting Change and Long†Term Construction Projects," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 211-226, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:10:y:1993:i:1:p:211-226
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1993.tb00390.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1993.tb00390.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1993.tb00390.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard A. Lambert, 1986. "Executive Effort and Selection of Risky Projects," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 17(1), pages 77-88, Spring.
    2. Bowen, Robert M. & Noreen, Eric W. & Lacey, John M., 1981. "Determinants of the corporate decision to capitalize interest," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 151-179, August.
    3. Horwitz, Bn & Kolodny, R, 1980. "The Economic-Effects Of Involuntary Uniformity In The Financial-Reporting Of R And D Expenditures," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18, pages 38-74.
    4. A. Rashad Abdel†Khalik & Charles Chi & Dimitrios Ghicas, 1987. "Rationality of executive compensation schemes and real accounting changes," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 32-60, September.
    5. Larcker, David F., 1983. "The association between performance plan adoption and corporate capital investment," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 3-30, April.
    6. Baiman, S., 1989. "Agency Research In Managerial Accounting: A Second Look," GSIA Working Papers 88-89-44, Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business.
    7. Healy, Paul M. & Kang, Sok-Hyon & Palepu, Krishna G., 1987. "The effect of accounting procedure changes on CEOs' cash salary and bonus compensation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 7-34, April.
    8. Dukes, Re & Dyckman, Tr & Elliott, Ja, 1980. "Accounting For Research And Development Costs - The Impact On Research And Development Expenditures," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18, pages 1-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Keune, Marsha B. & Keune, Timothy M. & Quick, Linda A., 2017. "Voluntary changes in accounting principle: Literature review, descriptive data, and opportunities for future research," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 52-81.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Randolph P. Beatty & Robert E. Verrecchia, 1989. "The effect of a mandated accounting change on the capitalization process," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 472-493, March.
    2. Michael Ettredge & Jeong Youn Kim, 1994. "Dividend behavior surrounding LIFO adoption," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 39-53, September.
    3. Bushman, Robert M. & Smith, Abbie J., 2001. "Financial accounting information and corporate governance," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 237-333, December.
    4. Masao Nakamura & Alice O. Nakamura & Peter Tiessen & W. Erwin Diewert, 2003. "Information failure as an alternative explanation of under investment in R&D," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2-3), pages 231-239.
    5. Comprix, Joseph & Muller III, Karl A., 2006. "Asymmetric treatment of reported pension expense and income amounts in CEO cash compensation calculations," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 385-416, December.
    6. A. Rashad Abdel†Khalik & Charles Chi & Dimitrios Ghicas, 1987. "Rationality of executive compensation schemes and real accounting changes," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 32-60, September.
    7. Wei Zhang & Steven F. Cahan, 2010. "Nonrecurring Accounting Transactions and Stock Option Grants," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1-2), pages 93-129.
    8. Rajgopal, Shivaram & Shevlin, Terry, 2002. "Empirical evidence on the relation between stock option compensation and risk taking," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 145-171, June.
    9. Ferris, Stephen P. & Kumar, Raman & Sant, Rajiv & Sopariwala, Parvez R., 1998. "An agency analysis of the effect of long-term performance plans on managerial decision making," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 73-91.
    10. Balsam, Steven & Haw, In-Mu & Lilien, Steven B., 1995. "Mandated accounting changes and managerial discretion," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 3-29, July.
    11. Wallace, James S., 1997. "Adopting residual income-based compensation plans: Do you get what you pay for?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 275-300, December.
    12. John S. Hughes & Jennifer L. Kao, 1991. "Economic implications of alternative disclosure rules for research and development costs," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 152-169, September.
    13. Keune, Marsha B. & Keune, Timothy M. & Quick, Linda A., 2017. "Voluntary changes in accounting principle: Literature review, descriptive data, and opportunities for future research," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 52-81.
    14. Golec, Joseph & Starks, Laura, 2004. "Performance fee contract change and mutual fund risk," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 93-118, July.
    15. Dennis Oswald & Ana Simpson & Paul Zarowin, 2022. "Capitalization vs. expensing and the behavior of R&D expenditures," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 1199-1232, December.
    16. Brown, Lawrence D., 1996. "Influential accounting articles, individuals, Ph.D. granting institutions and faculties: A citational analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(7-8), pages 723-754.
    17. Anne Beatty, 2007. "How does changing measurement change management behaviour? A review of the evidence," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(S1), pages 63-71.
    18. Roychowdhury, Sugata & Shroff, Nemit & Verdi, Rodrigo S., 2019. "The effects of financial reporting and disclosure on corporate investment: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2).
    19. Julia Grant & Garen Markarian & Antonio Parbonetti, 2009. "CEO Risk†Related Incentives and Income Smoothing," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 1029-1065, December.
    20. Nemit Shroff, 2017. "Corporate investment and changes in GAAP," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-63, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:10:y:1993:i:1:p:211-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.