Author
Listed:
- Geraldine Macdonald
- Julian PT Higgins
- Paul Ramchandani
- Jeffrey C. Valentine
- Latricia P. Bronger
- Paul Klein
- Roland O'Daniel
- Mark Pickering
- Ben Rademaker
- George Richardson
- Matthew Taylor
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy of cognitive‐behavioural approaches (CBT) in addressing the immediate and longer‐term sequelae of sexual abuse on children and young people up to 18 years of age. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2011 Issue 4); MEDLINE (1950 to November Week 3 2011); EMBASE (1980 to Week 47 2011); CINAHL (1937 to 2 December 2011); PsycINFO (1887 to November Week 5 2011); LILACS (1982 to 2 December 2011) and OpenGrey, previously OpenSIGLE (1980 to 2 December 2011). For this update we also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We included 10 trials, involving 847 participants. The conclusions of this updated review remain the same as those when it was first published. The review confirms the potential of CBT to address the adverse consequences of child sexual abuse, but highlights the limitations of the evidence base and the need for more carefully conducted and better reported trials. Abstract BACKGROUND Despite differences in how it is defined, there is a general consensus amongst clinicians and researchers that the sexual abuse of children and adolescents (‘child sexual abuse‘) is a substantial social problem worldwide. The effects of sexual abuse manifest in a wide range of symptoms, including fear, anxiety, post‐traumatic stress disorder and various externalising and internalising behaviour problems, such as inappropriate sexual behaviours. Child sexual abuse is associated with increased risk of psychological problems in adulthood. Cognitive‐behavioural approaches are used to help children and their non‐offending or ‘safe’ parent to manage the sequelae of childhood sexual abuse. This review updates the first Cochrane review of cognitive‐behavioural approaches interventions for children who have been sexually abused, which was first published in 2006. OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy of cognitive‐behavioural approaches (CBT) in addressing the immediate and longer‐term sequelae of sexual abuse on children and young people up to 18 years of age. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2011 Issue 4); MEDLINE (1950 to November Week 3 2011); EMBASE (1980 to Week 47 2011); CINAHL (1937 to 2 December 2011); PsycINFO (1887 to November Week 5 2011); LILACS (1982 to 2 December 2011) and OpenGrey, previously OpenSIGLE (1980 to 2 December 2011). For this update we also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised or quasi‐randomised controlled trials of CBT used with children and adolescents up to age 18 years who had experienced being sexually abused, compared with treatment as usual, with or without placebo control. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS At least two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of titles and abstracts identified in the search. Two review authors independently extracted data from included studies and entered these into Review Manager 5 software. We synthesised and presented data in both written and graphical form (forest plots). RESULTS We included 10 trials, involving 847 participants. All studies examined CBT programmes provided to children or children and a non‐offending parent. Control groups included wait list controls (n = 1) or treatment as usual (n = 9). Treatment as usual was, for the most part, supportive, unstructured psychotherapy. Generally the reporting of studies was poor. Only four studies were judged ‘low risk of bias’ with regards to sequence generation and only one study was judged ‘low risk of bias’ in relation to allocation concealment. All studies were judged ‘high risk of bias’ in relation to the blinding of outcome assessors or personnel; most studies did not report on these, or other issues of bias. Most studies reported results for study completers rather than for those recruited. Depression, post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety and child behaviour problems were the primary outcomes. Data suggest that CBT may have a positive impact on the sequelae of child sexual abuse, but most results were not statistically significant. Strongest evidence for positive effects of CBT appears to be in reducing PTSD and anxiety symptoms, but even in these areas effects tend to be ‘moderate’ at best. Meta‐analysis of data from five studies suggested an average decrease of 1.9 points on the Child Depression Inventory immediately after intervention (95% confidence interval (CI) decrease of 4.0 to increase of 0.4; I2 = 53%; P value for heterogeneity = 0.08), representing a small to moderate effect size. Data from six studies yielded an average decrease of 0.44 standard deviations on a variety of child post‐traumatic stress disorder scales (95% CI 0.16 to 0.73; I2 = 46%; P value for heterogeneity = 0.10). Combined data from five studies yielded an average decrease of 0.23 standard deviations on various child anxiety scales (95% CI 0.3 to 0.4; I2 = 0%; P value for heterogeneity = 0.84). No study reported adverse effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The conclusions of this updated review remain the same as those when it was first published. The review confirms the potential of CBT to address the adverse consequences of child sexual abuse, but highlights the limitations of the evidence base and the need for more carefully conducted and better reported trials. Plain language summary The sexual abuse of children is a substantial social problem that affects large numbers of children and young people worldwide. For many children, though not all, it can result in a range of psychological and behavioural problems, some of which can continue into adulthood. Knowing what is most likely to benefit children already traumatised by these events is important. This review aimed to find out if cognitive‐behavioural approaches (CBT) help reduce the negative impact of sexual abuse on children. Ten studies, in which a total of 847 children participated, met the inclusion criteria for the review. The reporting of studies was poor, and there appear to be significant weaknesses in study quality. The evidence suggests that CBT may have a positive impact on the effects of child sexual abuse, including depression, post‐traumatic stress and anxiety, but the results were generally modest. Implications for practice and further research are noted.
Suggested Citation
Geraldine Macdonald & Julian PT Higgins & Paul Ramchandani & Jeffrey C. Valentine & Latricia P. Bronger & Paul Klein & Roland O'Daniel & Mark Pickering & Ben Rademaker & George Richardson & Matthew Ta, 2012.
"Cognitive‐Behavioural Interventions for Children Who Have Been Sexually Abused: A Systematic Review,"
Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 1-111.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:camsys:v:8:y:2012:i:1:p:1-111
DOI: 10.4073/csr.2012.14
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Ben Parker & William Turner, 2013.
"Psychoanalytic/Psycho‐dynamic Psychotherapy for Children and Adolescents Who Have Been Sexually Abused: A Systematic Review,"
Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages -58.
- Etienne Lwamba & Will Ridlehoover & Meital Kupfer & Shannon Shisler & Ada Sonnenfeld & Laurenz Langer & John Eyers & Sean Grant & Bidisha Barooah, 2021.
"PROTOCOL: Strengthening women's empowerment and gender equality in fragile contexts towards peaceful and inclusive societies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis,"
Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), September.
- Charity Mae Mayo-Dosayla & Dennis V. Madrigal, 2021.
"A Case Study of the School Behavior of Abused Children with Behavior Modification Intervention,"
Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 20(1), pages 244-254, June.
- Matthew Manning & Susanne Garvis & Christopher Fleming & Gabriel T.W. Wong, 2017.
"The relationship between teacher qualification and the quality of the early childhood education and care environment,"
Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 1-82.
- Rehana A Salam & Jai K Das & Zahra Hoodbhoy & Karim Rizwan Nathani & Zulfiqar A Bhutta, 2018.
"PROTOCOL: Effects of lifestyle modification interventions to prevent and manage child and adolescent obesity: a systematic review,"
Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 1-33.
- Etienne Lwamba & Shannon Shisler & Will Ridlehoover & Meital Kupfer & Nkululeko Tshabalala & Promise Nduku & Laurenz Langer & Sean Grant & Ada Sonnenfeld & Daniela Anda & John Eyers & Birte Snilstveit, 2022.
"Strengthening women's empowerment and gender equality in fragile contexts towards peaceful and inclusive societies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis,"
Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), March.
- Tichelaar, Henny K. & Deković, Maja & Endendijk, Joyce J., 2020.
"Exploring effectiveness of psychotherapy options for sexually abused children and adolescents: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials,"
Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
- Constanza Gonzalez Parrao & Shannon Shisler & Marta Moratti & Cem Yavuz & Arnab Acharya & John Eyers & Birte Snilstveit, 2021.
"Aquaculture for improving productivity, income, nutrition and women's empowerment in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis,"
Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), December.
- Constanza Gonzalez Parrao & Marta Moratti & Shannon Shisler & Birte Snilstveit & John Eyers, 2021.
"PROTOCOL: Aquaculture for improving productivity, income, nutrition and women's empowerment in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis,"
Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), September.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:8:y:2012:i:1:p:1-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.