IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v19y2023i3ne1344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PROTOCOL: School‐based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: An updated systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Valdebenito
  • Hannah Gaffney
  • Darrick Jolliffe

Abstract

The primary goal of the present mixed methods review is to systematically examine the available evidence for the effectiveness of different types of school‐based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion. Quantitative evidence will help to understand the overall size of the impact, as well as the factors that better explain it. Qualitative evidence will help to better understand how these programmes may work, and what factors aid or hinder implementation and success. The research questions underlying the quantitative review are as follows: Do school‐based programmes reduce the use of exclusionary sanctions in schools? Are some school‐based approaches more effective than others in reducing exclusionary sanctions? Do participants’ characteristics (e.g., age, sex, or ethnicity) affect the impact of school‐based programmes on exclusionary sanctions in schools? Do characteristics of the interventions, implementation, and methodology affect the impact of school‐based programmes on exclusionary sanctions in schools? Do school‐based programmes have an impact on reducing the involvement of children and young people in crime and violence? Do participants’ characteristics (e.g., age, gender, ethnicity) affect the impact of school‐based programmes on crime and violence? If sufficient data are available, we will compare different approaches (e.g., school‐wide management, classroom management, restorative justice, cognitive‐behavioural interventions) and identify those that could potentially demonstrate larger effects. We will also (potentially) run analysis controlling for characteristics of participants (e.g., age, ethnicity, level of risk); interventions (e.g., theoretical bases, components); implementation (e.g., facilitators’ training, doses, quality); and methodology (e.g., research design). The research questions underlying the qualitative review are defined as follows: What are the barriers and facilitators to implementation of interventions to reduce school exclusions? What are the barriers and facilitators to implementation of interventions to reduce the involvement of children and young people in crime and violence?

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Valdebenito & Hannah Gaffney & Darrick Jolliffe, 2023. "PROTOCOL: School‐based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: An updated systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:19:y:2023:i:3:n:e1344
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1344
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.1344?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theriot, Matthew T. & Craun, Sarah W. & Dupper, David R., 2010. "Multilevel evaluation of factors predicting school exclusion among middle and high school students," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 13-19, January.
    2. Gentile, Elisabetta & Imberman, Scott A., 2012. "Dressed for success? The effect of school uniforms on student achievement and behavior," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 1-17.
    3. Shannon Kugley & Anne Wade & James Thomas & Quenby Mahood & Anne‐Marie Klint Jørgensen & Karianne Hammerstrøm & Nila Sathe, 2017. "Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 1-73.
    4. Alex R. Piquero & David P. Farrington & Brandon C. Welsh & Richard Tremblay & Wesley G. Jennings, 2008. "Effects of Early Family/Parent Training Programs on Antisocial Behavior & Delinquency," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 1-122.
    5. Alex R. Piquero & David P. Farrington & Brandon C. Welsh & Richard Tremblay & Wesley Jennings, 2008. "PROTOCOL: Effectiveness of Early Family/Parent Training Programs in Preventing Antisocial Behavior & Delinquency," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 1-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Kogel, Catharina H. & Alberda, Daphne L., 2019. "Bio-behavioral effects of early family interventions and prevention of antisocial behavior," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    2. Steve Agnew & Tom Coupé & Cassia-Rose Hingston, 2022. "Predictors of School Exclusion as a Disciplinary Measure in New Zealand: A Maori, Pacific Peoples and Pakeha Comparison," Working Papers in Economics 22/14, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    3. Sanjeev Sharma & Renu Popli & Sajjan Singh & Gunjan Chhabra & Gurpreet Singh Saini & Maninder Singh & Archana Sandhu & Ashutosh Sharma & Rajeev Kumar, 2024. "The Role of 6G Technologies in Advancing Smart City Applications: Opportunities and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-53, August.
    4. Howard White & Bianca Albers & Marie Gaarder & Hege Kornør & Julia Littell & Zack Marshall & Christine Mathew & Terri Pigott & Birte Snilstveit & Hugh Waddington & Vivian Welch, 2020. "Guidance for producing a Campbell evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), December.
    5. Martin Polak & Norbert Tanzer & Per Carlbring, 2022. "PROTOCOL: Effects of virtual reality exposure therapy versus in vivo exposure in treating social anxiety disorder in adults: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), September.
    6. Chris O'Leary & Rob Ralphs & Jennifer Stevenson & Andrew Smith & Jordan Harrison & Zsolt Kiss & Harry Armitage, 2024. "The effectiveness of abstinence‐based and harm reduction‐based interventions in reducing problematic substance use in adults who are experiencing homelessness in high income countries: A systematic re," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    7. Heather MacDonald & Cozette Comer & Margaret Foster & Patrick R. Labelle & Scott Marsalis & Kate Nyhan & Zahra Premji & Morwenna Rogers & Ryan Splenda & Claire Stansfield & Sarah Young, 2024. "Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), September.
    8. Eduardo González‐Cabañes & Trinidad Garcia & Catherine Chase & Jose Carlos Núñez, 2023. "PROTOCOL: Problem solving before instruction (PS‐I) to promote learning and motivation in child and adult students," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.
    9. Ajay Kumar & Sushil Kumar & Komal & Nirala Ramchiary & Pardeep Singh, 2021. "Role of Traditional Ethnobotanical Knowledge and Indigenous Communities in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Chakrabarti, Rajashri & Roy, Joydeep, 2016. "Do charter schools crowd out private school enrollment? Evidence from Michigan," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 88-103.
    11. Kylie Burke & Cassandra K. Dittman & Elana J. Forbes & Elizabeth Eggins, 2021. "PROTOCOL: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluating the impact of parenting programmes for parents of adolescents (10–18 years) on adolescent mental health outco," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), March.
    12. Hugh Waddington & Ada Sonnenfeld & Juliette Finetti & Marie Gaarder & Denny John & Jennifer Stevenson, 2019. "Citizen engagement in public services in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A mixed‐methods systematic review of participation, inclusion, transparency and accountability (PITA) initiatives," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1-2), June.
    13. Julie Birkenmaier & Brandy Maynard & Hannah Shanks & Harly Blumhagen, 2023. "PROTOCOL: Medical‐financial partnerships for improving financial and health outcomes for lower‐income Americans: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), December.
    14. Joseph Lee Betts & Elizabeth Eggins & Ned Chandler‐Mather & Doug Shelton & Haydn Till & Paul Harnett & Sharon Dawe, 2022. "Interventions for improving executive functions in children with foetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD): A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), December.
    15. Hugh Waddington & Jennifer Stevenson & Ada Sonnenfeld & Marie Gaarder, 2018. "PROTOCOL: Participation, inclusion, transparency and accountability (PITA) to improve public services in low‐ and middle‐income countries: a systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 1-69.
    16. Julia H. Littell & Sarah Young & Therese D. Pigott & M. Antonia Biggs & Trine Munk‐Olsen & Julia R. Steinberg, 2024. "PROTOCOL: Abortion and mental health outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    17. Etienne Lwamba & Shannon Shisler & Will Ridlehoover & Meital Kupfer & Nkululeko Tshabalala & Promise Nduku & Laurenz Langer & Sean Grant & Ada Sonnenfeld & Daniela Anda & John Eyers & Birte Snilstveit, 2022. "Strengthening women's empowerment and gender equality in fragile contexts towards peaceful and inclusive societies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), March.
    18. Julie Birkenmaier & Brandy Maynard & Youngmi Kim, 2022. "Interventions designed to improve financial capability: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), March.
    19. Emma Reith‐Hall & Paul Montgomery, 2023. "Communication skills training for improving the communicative abilities of student social workers: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), March.
    20. Nina T. Dalgaard & Anja Bondebjerg & Rasmus Klokker & Bjørn C. A. Viinholt & Jens Dietrichson, 2022. "Adult/child ratio and group size in early childhood education or care to promote the development of children aged 0–5 years: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:19:y:2023:i:3:n:e1344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.