IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v18y2022i4ne1277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information and communications technology use to prevent and respond to sexual and gender‐based violence in low‐ and middle‐income countries: An evidence and gap map

Author

Listed:
  • William Philbrick
  • Jacob Milnor
  • Madhu Deshmukh
  • Patricia Mechael

Abstract

Background The use of information and communications technologies (ICT) in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMIC) has increased significantly in the last several years, particularly in health, including related areas such as preventing and responding to sexual and gender‐based violence (SGBV) against women and children. While the evidence for ICT effectiveness has grown significantly in the past 5 years in other aspects of health, it has not for effectiveness of using ICT for the prevention and response to SGBV against women and children in LMIC. Objectives The primary goal of this evidence and gap map (EGM) is to establish a baseline for the state of the evidence connected with the use of ICT for preventing and responding to SGBV against women and children in LMIC. Objectives that contribute to the achievement of this goal are: (1) identifying evidence of effectiveness for the use of ICT targeting the prevention of, and response to, SGBV against women and children in LMIC; (2) identifying key gaps in the available ICT for SGBV prevention and/or response evidence; (3) identifying research methodology issues reflected in the current evidence; (4) identifying any clusters of evidence in one or more ICT interventions suitable for systematic review; (5) identifying enabling factors associated with effective interventions using ICT for the prevention of, and response to, SGBV against women and children in LMIC; and (6) providing a structured and accessible guide to stakeholders for future investment into interventions and research using ICT for SGBV prevention and response in LMIC. Search Methods The date of the last search from which records were evaluated, and any studies identified were incorporated into the EGM was July 11, 2021. Twenty (20) databases were searched, and identified under “Methods.” Selection Criteria We conducted systematic searches of multiple academic databases using search terms and criteria related to the use of ICT for prevention and/or response to SGBV against women and children. Although excluded, we did consider studies conducted in higher‐income countries (HIC) only to provide context and contrast for the EGM discussion of the eligible studies from LMIC. Data Collection and Analysis The EGM search process included five phases: (1) initial search of academic databases conducted by two researchers simultaneously; (2) comparison of search results, and abstract screening by two researchers collaboratively; (3) second screening by reviewing full articles of the studies identified in the first screening by two reviewers independently; (4) comparison of results of second screening; resolution of discrepancies of screening results; and (5) data extraction and analysis. Main Results The EGM includes 10 studies published in English of which 4 were systematic, literature or scoping reviews directly addressing some aspect of the use of ICT for SGBV prevention and/or response in women and girls. The six individual studies were, or are being, conducted in LMIC (a condition for eligibility). No eligible studies addressed children as a target group, although a number of the ineligible studies reported on the use of ICT for intermediate outcomes connected with violence against children (e.g., digital parenting). Yet, such studies did not explicitly attach those intermediate outcomes to SGBV prevention or response outcomes. Countries represented among the eligible individual studies include Cambodia, Kenya, Nepal Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and Lebanon. Of the 10 eligible studies (individual and reviews), most focused on intimate partner violence against women (IPV). Intervention areas among the eligible studies include safety planning using decision algorithms, educational and empowerment messaging regarding norms and attitudes towards gender‐based violence (GBV), multi‐media radio drama for social behavior change, the collection of survivor experience to inform SGBV/GBV services, and the collection of forensic evidence connected to the perpetration of SGBV. Thirty‐one studies which otherwise would have been eligible for the evidence and gap map (EGM) were conducted in HIC (identified under “Excluded Reviews”). None of the eligible studies reported results related to effectiveness of using ICT in a control setting, for the primary prevention of SGBV as an outcome, but rather reported on outcomes such as usability, secondary and tertiary prevention, feasibility, access to services and other outcomes primarily relating to the development of the interventions. Two studies identified IPV prevention as a measurable outcome within their protocols, but one of these had not yet formally published results regarding primary prevention as an outcome. The other study, while reporting on the protocol (and steps to adapt the ICT application, previously reported as effective in HIC contexts to a specific LMIC context), has not yet as of the date of writing this EGM, published outcome results related to the reduction of IPV. Of the four reviews identified as eligible, two are better characterized as either a literature review or case study rather than as traditional systematic reviews reporting on impact outcomes with methodologically rigorous protocols. Authors' Conclusions The evidence baseline for using ICT to prevent and/or respond to SGBV against women and children in LMIC is nascent. Promising areas for future study include: (1) how ICT can contribute changing gender and social norms related to SGBV and primary prevention; (2) mobile phone applications that promote safety and security; (3) mobile technology for the collection and analysis of survivors' experience with SGBV response services; and (4) digital tools that support the collection of forensic evidence for SGBV response and secondary prevention. Most striking is the paucity of eligible studies examining the use of ICT in connection with preventing or responding to SGBV against children. In light of the exponential increase in the use of ICT by children and adolescents, even in LMIC, greater attention should be given to examining how ICT can be used during adolescence to address gender norms that lead to SGBV. While there appears to be interest in using ICT for SGBV prevention and/or response in LMIC, other than several ad hoc studies, there is little evidence of if, and how effective these interventions are. Further inquiry should be made regarding if and how interventions proven effective in HIC can be adapted to LMIC contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • William Philbrick & Jacob Milnor & Madhu Deshmukh & Patricia Mechael, 2022. "Information and communications technology use to prevent and respond to sexual and gender‐based violence in low‐ and middle‐income countries: An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:18:y:2022:i:4:n:e1277
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1277
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.1277?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Casey, S.E. & Gallagher, M.C. & Makanda, B.R. & Meyers, J.L. & Vinas, M.C. & Austin, J., 2011. "Care-seeking behavior by survivors of sexual assault in the Democratic Republic of the Congo," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(6), pages 1054-1055.
    2. Elia Elisa Cia Alves & Andrea Quirino Steiner, 2017. "Globalization, Technology and Female Empowerment: Breaking Rights or Connecting Opportunities?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 859-877, September.
    3. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303808_2 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Cardoso, L.F. & Sorenson, S.B., 2017. "Violence against women and household ownership of radios, computers, and phones in 20 countries," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(7), pages 1175-1181.
    5. Bartels, Susan Andrea & Michael, Saja & Vahedi, Luissa & Collier, Amanda & Kelly, Jocelyn & Davison, Colleen & Scott, Jennifer & Parmar, Parveen & Geara, Petronille, 2019. "SenseMaker® as a monitoring and evaluation tool to provide new insights on gender-based violence programs and services in Lebanon," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. World Bank Group, 2016. "World Development Report 2016 [Rapport sur le développement dans le monde 2016]," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 23347.
    7. Ashrita Saran & Howard White, 2018. "Evidence and gap maps: a comparison of different approaches," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 1-38.
    8. Diana Jiménez-Rodríguez & María Teresa Belmonte García & Azucena Santillán García & Fernando Jesús Plaza del Pino & Alicia Ponce-Valencia & Oscar Arrogante, 2020. "Nurse Training in Gender-Based Violence Using Simulated Nursing Video Consultations during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William C. Philbrick & Jacob R. Milnor & Madhu Deshmukh & Patricia N. Mechael, 2021. "PROTOCOL: The use of information and communications technologies (ICT) for contributing to the prevention of, and response to, sexual and gender‐based violence against women and children in lower‐ and," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), March.
    2. World Bank, 2019. "Lesotho Climate-Smart Agriculture Investment Plan," World Bank Publications - Reports 33035, The World Bank Group.
    3. Federico Barbiellini Amidei & Matteo Gomellini & Paolo Piselli, 2018. "The contribution of demography to Italy's economic growth: a two-hundred-year-long story," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 431, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    4. World Bank, 2022. "Online Violence Against Young Female Workers," World Bank Publications - Reports 38147, The World Bank Group.
    5. Ran Xu & Yeong-Gil Kim & Chenglei Liang, 2024. "The Effect of Digitization on Economic Sustainable Growth in Shandong Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Hidalgo, Camila & Micco, Alejandro, 2024. "Computerization, offshoring and trade: The effect on developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    7. Seyi Saint Akadiri & Godwin Olasehinde-Willams & Ilham Haouas & Gold Olamide Lawal & Ayodeji Samson Fatigun & Yetunde Sadiq-Bamgbopa, 2024. "Natural resource rent, financial globalization, and environmental degradation: Evidence from a resource rich country," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(6), pages 2911-2934, September.
    8. Phan, Chung & Filomeni, Stefano & Kok, Seng Kiong, 2024. "The impact of technology on access to credit: A review of loan approval and terms in rural Vietnam and Thailand," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(PA).
    9. Nina Ashley Dela Cruz & Alyssa Cyrielle B. Villanueva & Lovely Ann Tolin & Sabrina Disse & Robert Lensink & Howard White, 2023. "PROTOCOL: Effects of interventions to improve access to financial services for micro‐, small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises in low‐ and middle‐income countries: An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.
    10. Marta Postuła & Wojciech Chmielewski & Piotr Puczyński & Rafał Cieślik, 2021. "The Impact of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) on Energy Poverty and Unemployment in Selected European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Ulrich Schmitt, 2021. "Projectability and Heritage Management of Design Knowledge: A Grass-Roots Artefact Perspective of a Longitudinal Research Project for Knowledge Management System Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Sophie Roupetz & Susan A. Bartels & Saja Michael & Negin Najjarnejad & Kimberley Anderson & Colleen Davison, 2020. "Displacement and Emotional Well-Being among Married and Unmarried Syrian Adolescent Girls in Lebanon: An Analysis of Narratives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Beuselinck, Christof & Karavitis, Panagiotis & Kazakis, Pantelis & Mouna, Niswatil, 2024. "E-government and corporate tax planning: International evidence," MPRA Paper 122742, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Jonathan Lilje & Hans-Joachim Mosler, 2016. "Continuation of Health Behaviors: Psychosocial Factors Sustaining Drinking Water Chlorination in a Longitudinal Study from Chad," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Pallavi Rajkhowa & Heike Baumüller, 2024. "Assessing the potential of ICT to increase land and labour productivity in agriculture: Global and regional perspectives," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 477-503, June.
    16. Gautham Vadakkepatt & Andrew Bryant & Ronald Paul Hill & Joshua Nunziato, 2022. "Can advertising benefit women’s development? Preliminary insights from a multi-method investigation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 503-520, May.
    17. Abebe Kebede Jalleta & Qin Tianbao, 2022. "Effectiveness of Chemical- and Hazardous-Waste-Based MEAs in Sustaining Life and Land: Analysis of Implementing Legislations and Practice in Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Haohui Caron Chen & Xun Li & Morgan Frank & Xiaozhen Qin & Weipan Xu & Manuel Cebrian & Iyad Rahwan, 2022. "Automation impacts on China’s polarized job market," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 517-535, May.
    19. Rahman, Mohammad Chhiddikur & Rahaman, Md. Shajedur & Islam, Mohammad Ariful & Omar, Md. Imran & Siddique, Md. Abu Bakr, 2021. "Deployment Strategies for Golden Rice in Bangladesh: A Study on Affordability and Varietal Choice with the Target Beneficiaries," EconStor Preprints 241994, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    20. Mr. Emre Alper & Michal Miktus, 2019. "Digital Connectivity in sub-Saharan Africa: A Comparative Perspective," IMF Working Papers 2019/210, International Monetary Fund.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:18:y:2022:i:4:n:e1277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.