IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v32y2023is1p41-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capitalism, COVID‐19 and lockdowns

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp Bagus
  • José Antonio Peña‐Ramos
  • Antonio Sánchez‐Bayón

Abstract

Commentators believe that the COVID‐19 pandemic reveals the inconveniences of capitalism and that the end of “neoliberalism” could be near. In this article we show that a capitalist ethics is capable to deal with the challenges of pandemics and comes with important advantages such as the prevention of overreactions. We apply both utilitarian and rights‐based ethics to the case of epidemics in general and COVID‐19 in particular. First a libertarian natural law ethics is used to assess the government interventions in the Corona pandemic. We maintain that these interventions cannot be justified from a libertarian point of view despite of the possible objections that are discussed such as the “potential threat argument”. Moreover, the utilitarian argument in favor of government lockdowns is evaluated. The negative effects of lockdown on mental health, addictions, domestic violence, etc. have to be taken into account. The utilitarian argument in favor of lockdown is far from convincing, as economic calculation is not possible.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp Bagus & José Antonio Peña‐Ramos & Antonio Sánchez‐Bayón, 2023. "Capitalism, COVID‐19 and lockdowns," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(S1), pages 41-51, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:32:y:2023:i:s1:p:41-51
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12431
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:32:y:2023:i:s1:p:41-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.