IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v32y2023i4p1389-1410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Not all stakeholders are equal: Corporate social responsibility variability and corporate financial performance

Author

Listed:
  • Yongqiang Gao
  • Yumeng Nie
  • Taïeb Hafsi

Abstract

The advocates of “doing well by doing good” have advised firms to invest in corporate social responsibility (CSR), but firms may get lost on how to invest their limited resources in it since CSR is a complex concept involving many activities and different types of stakeholders. In this work, we draw upon the perspective of stakeholder saliency and the stakeholder resource‐based view (SRBV) to propose that stakeholders may have different levels of expectations for CSR and contribute to firm value creation differently. Therefore, firms using different CSR to treat different stakeholders (high CSR variability) will have better financial performance. We further propose that context, in particular media coverage and state ownership, moderates the relationship between CSR variability and firm performance, as stakeholders of highly visible firms and state‐owned enterprises (SOEs) may frown upon a discriminate treatment in CSR. Findings based on a sample of 3313 publicly listed firms and 15,324 firm‐year observations in China's stock markets during the 2010–2018 period provide good support for our predictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongqiang Gao & Yumeng Nie & Taïeb Hafsi, 2023. "Not all stakeholders are equal: Corporate social responsibility variability and corporate financial performance," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 1389-1410, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:32:y:2023:i:4:p:1389-1410
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12576
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12576?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:32:y:2023:i:4:p:1389-1410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.