IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v31y2022i4p1040-1052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can we have our cake and eat it too? Corporate social responsibility and employees’ eudaimonic well‐being and performance

Author

Listed:
  • Man Cao
  • Shuming Zhao
  • Hongjiang Lv
  • Danxia Wei

Abstract

Whereas extant studies on corporate social responsibility (CSR) have documented various favorable individual outcomes, potential social effects of CSR beyond mere economic influences, such as employees’ eudaimonic well‐being, are often overlooked. Drawing on a sensemaking perspective, our research examines how corporate social responsibility (CSR) leads to employees’ eudaimonic well‐being and enhances job performance. We used three‐source data covering senior managers and employees from 62 organizations to test our hypotheses. The results of the study show that CSR elicits employees’ perceived meaningfulness, which in turn contributes to employees’ eudaimonic well‐being as well as job performance. Furthermore, we found that when CEO’s humble leadership is high, CSR would function better on employees’ perceived meaningfulness. Overall, this study provides a nuanced understanding of CSR by examining when and how it can simultaneously facilitate employees’ eudaimonic well‐being and job performance. The findings also provide important suggestions and implications for organizational sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Man Cao & Shuming Zhao & Hongjiang Lv & Danxia Wei, 2022. "Can we have our cake and eat it too? Corporate social responsibility and employees’ eudaimonic well‐being and performance," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 1040-1052, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:1040-1052
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12449
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12449?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:1040-1052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.