IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apsmbi/v37y2021i1p3-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Virtual age, is it real? ‐ Discussing virtual age in reliability context

Author

Listed:
  • Maxim Finkelstein
  • Ji Hwan Cha

Abstract

Several settings, where the notion of virtual age is employed, are discussed. We argue that the age reduction imperfect repair modeling is often not sufficiently justified in practice, as it is not possible to execute repair in most of real situations that conforms with this model. On the other hand, a shock‐based virtual age model is suggested and justified via the probabilities of failures on shocks. The new notion of virtual age for degrading items is also introduced. We discuss how to recalculate virtual age after switching from one regime to another. Several examples illustrating different notions of virtual age are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Maxim Finkelstein & Ji Hwan Cha, 2021. "Virtual age, is it real? ‐ Discussing virtual age in reliability context," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 3-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:37:y:2021:i:1:p:3-16
    DOI: 10.1002/asmb.2567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2567
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asmb.2567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pham, Hoang & Wang, Hongzhou, 1996. "Imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 425-438, November.
    2. Maxim Finkelstein, 2008. "Failure Rate Modelling for Reliability and Risk," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84800-986-8, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beutner, Eric, 2023. "A review of effective age models and associated non- and semiparametric methods," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 105-119.
    2. Fu, Yuqiang & Wang, Jun, 2022. "Optimum periodic maintenance policy of repairable multi-component system with component reallocation and system overhaul," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    3. Zheng, Rui & Zhao, Xufeng & Hu, Chaoming & Ren, Xiangyun, 2023. "A repair-replacement policy for a system subject to missions of random types and random durations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    4. Lirong Cui, 2021. "Discussion of virtual age, is it real?," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 41-44, January.
    5. Syamsundar, A. & Naikan, V.N.A. & Wu, Shaomin, 2021. "Extended Arithmetic Reduction of Age Models for the Failure Process of a Repairable System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    6. Maxim Finkelstein & Ji Hwan Cha, 2021. "Rejoinder to “Virtual age, is it real?”," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 45-52, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ait Mokhtar, El Hassene & Laggoune, Radouane & Chateauneuf, Alaa, 2023. "Imperfect maintenance modeling and assessment of repairable multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Maxim Finkelstein & Mahmood Shafiee, 2017. "Preventive maintenance for systems with repairable minor failures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(2), pages 101-108, April.
    3. Maxim Finkelstein & Gregory Levitin & Oleg A Stepanov, 2019. "On operation termination for degrading systems with two types of failures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(3), pages 419-426, June.
    4. Chaoqun Duan & Chao Deng & Bingran Wang, 2019. "Multi-phase sequential preventive maintenance scheduling for deteriorating repairable systems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1779-1793, April.
    5. Xiang, Yisha, 2013. "Joint optimization of X¯ control chart and preventive maintenance policies: A discrete-time Markov chain approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 382-390.
    6. Zhao, Xiujie & He, Shuguang & Xie, Min, 2018. "Utilizing experimental degradation data for warranty cost optimization under imperfect repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 108-119.
    7. Gregory Levitin & Maxim Finkelstein, 2018. "Optimal Mission Abort Policy for Systems Operating in a Random Environment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(4), pages 795-803, April.
    8. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Dai, Yuanshun, 2020. "Mission abort policy optimization for series systems with overlapping primary and rescue subsystems operating in a random environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.
    10. Seyed Habib A. Rahmati & Abbas Ahmadi & Kannan Govindan, 2018. "A novel integrated condition-based maintenance and stochastic flexible job shop scheduling problem: simulation-based optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 583-621, October.
    11. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2019. "New failure and minimal repair processes for repairable systems in a random environment," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 522-536, May.
    12. Guo R. & Ascher H. & Love E., 2001. "Towards Practical and Synthetical Modelling of Repairable Systems," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 147-182, January.
    13. Raouf, BOUCEKKINE & Blanca, MARTINEZ & Cagri, SAGLAM, 2006. "Capital Maintenance Vs Technology Adopton under Embodied Technical Progress," Discussion Papers (ECON - Département des Sciences Economiques) 2006030, Université catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques.
    14. Maxim S. Finkelstein, 2008. "On systems with shared resources and optimal switching strategies," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2008-025, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    15. Dewan, Isha & Dijoux, Yann, 2015. "Modelling repairable systems with an early life under competing risks and asymmetric virtual age," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 215-224.
    16. Chen, Yiming & Liu, Yu & Jiang, Tao, 2021. "Optimal maintenance strategy for multi-state systems with single maintenance capacity and arbitrarily distributed maintenance time," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    17. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    18. Laniado Rodas, Henry, 2013. "Allocation policies of redundancies in two-parallel-series and two-series-parallel systems," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws132622, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    19. Montoro-Cazorla, Delia & Pérez-Ocón, Rafael, 2018. "Constructing a Markov process for modelling a reliability system under multiple failures and replacements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 34-47.
    20. Ruey Yeh & Wen Chang & Hui-Chiung Lo, 2010. "Optimal threshold values of age and two-phase maintenance policy for leased equipments using age reduction method," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 171-183, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:37:y:2021:i:1:p:3-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4025 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.