IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apsmbi/v27y2011i2p115-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling and validating stakeholder preferences with probabilistic inversion

Author

Listed:
  • R. E. J. Neslo
  • R. M. Cooke

Abstract

Despite the vast number of models that have been developed for analyzing stakeholders' preferences, it is difficult to find any true out‐of‐sample validation for these models. Based on the theory of rational preference, utilities are specific to the individual. Unlike subjective probability, there is no mechanism for changing utilities on the basis of observation, and no operation for getting people's utilities to converge. The proper goal of stakeholder preference modeling must therefore be the characterization of a population of stakeholders via a distribution over utility functions. Drawing on the theory of discrete choice and random utility theory, we apply probabilistic inversion methods to derive a distribution over utility functions. The utility functions may either attach to the choice alternatives directly, or may be functions of physical attributes. Because the utilities are inferred from discrete choice data, out‐of‐sample validation is enabled by splitting the data into a test set used to fit the model and a validation set. These techniques are illustrated using discrete choice data for the valuation of health states. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • R. E. J. Neslo & R. M. Cooke, 2011. "Modeling and validating stakeholder preferences with probabilistic inversion," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 115-130, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:27:y:2011:i:2:p:115-130
    DOI: 10.1002/asmb.888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.888
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asmb.888?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Werner, Christoph & Bedford, Tim & Cooke, Roger M. & Hanea, Anca M. & Morales-Nápoles, Oswaldo, 2017. "Expert judgement for dependence in probabilistic modelling: A systematic literature review and future research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 801-819.
    2. R. E. J. Neslo & W. Oei & M. P. Janssen, 2017. "Insight into “Calculated Risk”: An Application to the Prioritization of Emerging Infectious Diseases for Blood Transfusion Safety," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(9), pages 1783-1795, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:27:y:2011:i:2:p:115-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4025 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.