IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apecpp/v47y2025i2p774-800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do farmers respond to Workers' compensation insurance premiums, hazards, and claim contagion? Empirical evidence from Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Hung‐Hao Chang
  • David R. Just
  • David Zilberman

Abstract

Workers' compensation benefits are of significant importance to employees generally, though relatively little is known about their application to agricultural workers. We examine how farmers respond to workers' compensation by exploiting the introduction of a unique Farmer Occupational Injury (FOI) program in Taiwan. The FOI provides farmers with income compensation for medical expenses, losses caused by temporary and permanent disability or death, and funeral expenses. We examine farmers' participation decisions and the timing of participation in the program. Using the individual‐level administrative records of the program and a two‐part econometric model, the estimated elasticities of the out‐of‐pocket insurance premium and environmental risk to FOI enrolled days are −0.36 and 0.27, respectively. Claim contagion, a form of moral hazard, has been discussed in the context of workers' compensation programs, though little prior work exists. Using aggregate township‐level panel data, we find evidence of the claim contagion effect. We find that a 1% increase in the cumulative compensation payments increases the number of claims filed in the following period by 0.14%. We also find significant claim contagion for temporary disability and funeral allowance claims, but not for permanent disability.

Suggested Citation

  • Hung‐Hao Chang & David R. Just & David Zilberman, 2025. "How do farmers respond to Workers' compensation insurance premiums, hazards, and claim contagion? Empirical evidence from Taiwan," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(2), pages 774-800, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:47:y:2025:i:2:p:774-800
    DOI: 10.1002/aepp.13491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13491
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/aepp.13491?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:47:y:2025:i:2:p:774-800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2040-5804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.