IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apecpp/v47y2025i1p49-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are we measuring impact accurately? Identifying potential sources of bias in the evaluation of extension personnel and programs

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Wright
  • Jeffrey Wright
  • Dean McCorkle
  • Jeffrey Hyde

Abstract

Agricultural extension programs must demonstrate their value to compete for limited government funding. As extension professionals measure the value of their programs, the risk exists that the information they report will provide a biased or an inaccurate measure of value. We examine the evaluation process for extension programs and extension personnel to identify potential sources of bias or inaccuracies. We find that bias and inaccuracy in program evaluation often stems from a focus on short‐term outcomes, rather than long‐term impacts, while bias in personnel evaluation can result from information asymmetries that exist between extension personnel and their evaluators.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Wright & Jeffrey Wright & Dean McCorkle & Jeffrey Hyde, 2025. "Are we measuring impact accurately? Identifying potential sources of bias in the evaluation of extension personnel and programs," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 49-64, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:47:y:2025:i:1:p:49-64
    DOI: 10.1002/aepp.13478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13478
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/aepp.13478?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:47:y:2025:i:1:p:49-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2040-5804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.