IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/stintr/v19y2018i3p407-431n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role Of Breastfeeding Vis-À-Vis Contraceptive Use On Birth Spacing In India: A Regional Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Dwivedi Laxmi Kant

    (Department of Mathematical Demography, Statistics International Institute for Population Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai, 400 088, India .)

Abstract

Birth spacing is one of the important aspects of reproductive health. Therefore, it is felt by demographers that birth spacing needs to be studied from time to time in view of the epidemiological transition taking place worldwide. Using the third round of National Family Health Survey-3 data, the central hypothesis of this paper is to find out the relative advantages of breastfeeding over other methods of contraception among non-sterilized women by using simulative approach of the Cox regression analysis in India and its regions. The results show that if women were not having amenorrhea period and had a high level of breastfeeding, the chance of not having next live birth was only two percent lower than those women who were using spacing methods in India. This pattern was found to be almost similar in all the regions of India except central and southern regions. There is no significant gain in postponing the next live birth has been observed in using the contraceptives than breastfeeding. An effort has also been made to apprise the policymakers of the interrelation between breastfeeding, postpartum amenorrhea, contraceptive use and birth spacing. Nonetheless, policymakers should promote programs that encourage both breastfeeding and contraceptive use. Breastfeeding has direct benefits for infant health in addition to its role in lengthening birth intervals beyond postpartum amenorrhea.

Suggested Citation

  • Dwivedi Laxmi Kant, 2018. "The Role Of Breastfeeding Vis-À-Vis Contraceptive Use On Birth Spacing In India: A Regional Analysis," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 19(3), pages 407-431, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:stintr:v:19:y:2018:i:3:p:407-431:n:1
    DOI: 10.21307/stattrans-2018-023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.21307/stattrans-2018-023
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.21307/stattrans-2018-023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. Namboodiri, 1974. "Which couples at given parities expect to have additional births? An exercise in discriminant analysis," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 11(1), pages 45-56, February.
    2. Julie DaVanzo & Abdur Razzaque & Mizanur Rahman & Lauren Hale & Kapil Ahmed & Mehrab Ali Khan & Golam Mustafa & Kaniz Gausia, 2004. "The Effects of Birth Spacing on Infant and Child Mortality, Pregnancy Outcomes, and Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in Matlab, Bangladesh," Working Papers WR-198, RAND Corporation.
    3. Julie DaVanzo & Abdur Razzaque & Mizanur Rahman & Lauren Hale & Kapil Ahmed & Mehrab Ali Khan & Golam Mustafa & Kaniz Gausia, 2004. "The Effects of Birth Spacing on Infant and Child Mortality, Pregnancy Outcomes, and Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in Matlab, Bangladesh," Working Papers 198, RAND Corporation.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laxmi Kant Dwivedi, 2018. "The Role Of Breastfeeding Vis-À-Vis Contraceptive Use On Birth Spacing In India: A Regional Analysis," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 19(3), pages 407-431, September.
    2. Lambert, Sylvie & Rossi, Pauline, 2016. "Sons as widowhood insurance: Evidence from Senegal," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 113-127.
    3. Martine Audibert & Robert Kolesar, 2017. "Post-neonatal Mortality Impacts Following Grants from the Gavi Vaccine Alliance: An Econometric Analysis from 2000 to 2014," Working Papers halshs-01484982, HAL.
    4. Saha, U.R., 2012. "Econometric models of child mortality dynamics in rural Bangladesh," Other publications TiSEM f734b639-9696-480e-96f0-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Onanuga, Olaronke & Onanuga, Abayomi, 2014. "Economics of the Environment and Infant Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa," MPRA Paper 83323, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Priyanka Dixit & Laxmi Kant Dwivedi & Amrita Gupta, 2017. "Role of Maternal and Child Health Care Services on Postpartum Contraceptive Adoption in India," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, September.
    7. G. Naline & Brinda Viswanathan, 2017. "Predictors of Age-Specific Childhood Mortality in India," Working Papers 2017-167, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    8. Francesco Scalone, 2014. "Effects of nutritional stress and socio-economic status on maternal mortality in six German villages, 1766-1863," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(2), pages 217-236, July.
    9. Desalegn Markos Shifti & Catherine Chojenta & Elizabeth G. Holliday & Deborah Loxton, 2020. "Individual and community level determinants of short birth interval in Ethiopia: A multilevel analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Robert John KOLESAR & Martine AUDIBERT, 2017. "Post-neonatal Mortality Impacts Following Grants from the Gavi Vaccine Alliance: An Econometric Analysis from 2000 to 2014," Working Papers 201707, CERDI.
    11. Sági, Judit & Lentner, Csaba, 2020. "A magyar népességpolitikai intézkedések tényezői és várható hatásai [Factors and expected outcomes of pro-birth policy interventions]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 289-308.
    12. Wander, Hilde, 1980. "Ursachen des Geburtenrückgangs in ökonomischer Sicht: Theoretische Ansätze und empirische Ergebnisse unter Berücksichtigung der Verhältnisse in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland," Kiel Discussion Papers 71, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    13. Abel Fekadu Dadi, 2015. "A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Short Birth Interval on Infant Mortality in Ethiopia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-11, May.
    14. Rodolfo Bulatao, 1981. "Values and disvalues of children in successive childbearing decisions," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 18(1), pages 1-25, February.
    15. Ellen Fried & Sandra Hofferth & J. Udry, 1980. "Parity-Specific and two-sex utility models of reproductive intentions," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 17(1), pages 1-11, February.
    16. Julian Simon, 1975. "Puzzles and further explorations in the interrelationships of successive births with husband’s income, spouses’ education and race," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 12(2), pages 259-274, May.
    17. Warren Miller & David Bard & David Pasta & Joseph Rodgers, 2010. "Biodemographic modeling of the links between fertility motivation and fertility outcomes in the NLSY79," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 47(2), pages 393-414, May.
    18. Kristine Husøy Onarheim & Johanne Helene Iversen & David E Bloom, 2016. "Economic Benefits of Investing in Women’s Health: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, March.
    19. Deborah Freedman & Arland Thornton, 1982. "Income and fertility: The elusive relationship," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 19(1), pages 65-78, February.
    20. Donald Snyder, 1978. "Economic Variables and the Decision to Have Additional Children: Evidence from the Survey of Economic Opportunity," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 22(1), pages 12-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:stintr:v:19:y:2018:i:3:p:407-431:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://stat.gov.pl/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.