IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/reoecp/v18y2018i2p155-176n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-criteria Evaluation of the State of Professional Theatres in the Czech Republic in Terms of Mixed Public Goods Provided to the Citizens

Author

Listed:
  • Ardielli Eva

    (VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, Department of Public Economics, Sokolská 33, Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Bečica Jiří

    (VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, Department of Public Economics, Sokolská 33, Ostrava, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The provision of public goods is an important aspect of public sector management, and it is a subject of specific conditions. Public Goods should be provided efficiently and in accordance to consumer demand and should meet the provider's political and financial priorities as well as other obligatory commitments. An important role also play the citizens that are increasingly appealing on the provision of high-quality, accessible and cost-effective public goods in line with the principle of “value for money”. The evaluation of the provided public goods is, therefore, a topical issue. A particular case would be the provision of mixed public goods. This article deals with the topic of evaluation of mixed public goods provided in the cultural sector, specifically in the field of theatres. The basis of the economic value of cultural goods (products) and services is their rarity and utility value. Major difficulties are associated with the evaluation of freely available cultural goods or cultural services provided for non-equivalent admissions. Cultural goods often are of a high spiritual value in the eyes of the public, but, at the same time, their financial value is low. The aim of the paper is to evaluate the level of mixed public goods provided by Czech professional theatres from the perspective of technical and financial availability to citizens. For the assessment of the level of provided cultural goods, the multi-criteria evaluation method WSA is used. In terms of technical and financial aspects, the results of the research demonstrate a great variability across organizations associated in the Professional Theatres Association. The organizations are ranked according to the level of provided mixed public goods from best to worst.

Suggested Citation

  • Ardielli Eva & Bečica Jiří, 2018. "Multi-criteria Evaluation of the State of Professional Theatres in the Czech Republic in Terms of Mixed Public Goods Provided to the Citizens," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 18(2), pages 155-176, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:reoecp:v:18:y:2018:i:2:p:155-176:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/revecp-2018-0009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/revecp-2018-0009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/revecp-2018-0009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rãzvan-Andrei CORBOª & Ruxandra-Irina POPESCU, 2013. "Study regarding Theatres' Role in Increasing Urban Competitiveness Abstract: The analysis of successful experiences in urban development shows that one important vector in increasing the popularity of," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2013(20), pages 78-96, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bečica Jiří, 2018. "Income Self-Sufficiency and Profitability of Professional Theatres in the Czech Republic," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 18(3), pages 285-299, September.
    2. Roman Vavrek & Jiří Bečica, 2020. "Efficiency Evaluation of Cultural Services in the Czech Republic via Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:reoecp:v:18:y:2018:i:2:p:155-176:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.