IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/quageo/v43y2024i3p77-86n1005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User Preferences of Perspective and Dimensionality of Tourism Space Geovisualisation Supporting Orientation in a Non-Immersive Virtual Reality

Author

Listed:
  • Zajadacz Alina

    (Chair of Tourism and Recreation, Faculty of Geographical and Geological Sciences, Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań University, Poznań, Poland)

  • Halik Łukasz

    (Department of Cartography and Geomatics, Faculty of Geographical and Geological Sciences, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

The research problem was related to the search for appropriate parameters relevant to the tools that support spatial orientation in large-scale building plans. This problem was addressed by selecting the optimal (1) observation perspective (passerby perspective, bird-eye view perspective, top–down view perspective) in a non-immersive virtual reality (VR) and (2) the presentation dimensionality (2D/3D). The perception of the plans was analysed taking into account such independent variables as gender and the individual level of spatial orientation of the study participants, determined based on the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction (SBSOD) and the Mental Rotation tests (MRT). In the research conducted in 2021 on a sample of 103 people, the experimental methodology involved the comparison of preferences of the study participants in terms of geovisualisation before and after getting to know the real tourism space. The results showed the compliance of preferences, i.e. recognition as the optimal plan in 2D dimensionality and the top–down view perspective. No statistically significant differences in spatial orientation due to gender or individual predispositions measured by the SBSOD and the MRT tests were confirmed.

Suggested Citation

  • Zajadacz Alina & Halik Łukasz, 2024. "User Preferences of Perspective and Dimensionality of Tourism Space Geovisualisation Supporting Orientation in a Non-Immersive Virtual Reality," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 43(3), pages 77-86.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:43:y:2024:i:3:p:77-86:n:1005
    DOI: 10.14746/quageo-2024-0027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2024-0027
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14746/quageo-2024-0027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:43:y:2024:i:3:p:77-86:n:1005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.