IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/quageo/v41y2022i4p107-125n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tourism Development in the Borderlands of Romania: A Case Study of the Danube Gorge–Iron Gates

Author

Listed:
  • Băbăț Andrei-Florin

    (Department of Geography, University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania)

  • Pavel Sorin

    (Department of Geography, West University of Timisoara, Timisoara)

Abstract

Border areas are a real challenge for tourism development. Usually associated with the periphery from a socio-economic point of view, these areas often have natural potential and attractive landscapes that have been little transformed by human activity and numerous historical and cultural tourist attractions. Although these areas have considerable tourism potential, this is not sufficient for the sustainable development of tourism and the exploitation of this potential is strongly influenced by the degree of permeability of the border. This is the case of the Romanian-Serbian border, which overlaps the most spectacular sector of the Danube – the Iron Gates Gorge. The main aim of this article is to analyse the role of tourism in the development of border areas and how it functions in a particular territorial context: the Danube Gorge located at the border between Romania and Serbia. The Romanian-Serbian border currently functions as an external border of the European Union in a favourable historical and political context, given the tradition of good neighbourliness between the two entities, the states located on either side of the Danube. However, the communist period altered the prospects for tourism development in this region through a very drastic and controlled border regime, even though the area benefited from major investment projects, such as the dam and hydroelectric power station at Porțile de Fier, built in the 1970s in cooperation with the former Yugoslavia. An analysis of the statistical data on tourism development shows that tourist traffic is on the increase, although there is a contradiction between the upward trend in tourist flows and the backwardness of large-scale tourist infrastructure, with the dominant type of accommodation being small, flexible, and rural accommodation that does not require large investments. The results presented in this article can be summarised in the general conclusion that the development of tourism in the Danube Gorge–Iron Gates remains dependent on the political factor and the border regime, even though the region has a remarkable tourism potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Băbăț Andrei-Florin & Pavel Sorin, 2022. "Tourism Development in the Borderlands of Romania: A Case Study of the Danube Gorge–Iron Gates," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 41(4), pages 107-125, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:41:y:2022:i:4:p:107-125:n:7
    DOI: 10.14746/quageo-2022-0037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2022-0037
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14746/quageo-2022-0037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Causevic, Senija & Lynch, Paul, 2013. "Political (in)stability and its influence on tourism development," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 145-157.
    2. Beatrix Haselsberger, 2014. "Decoding borders. Appreciating border impacts on space and people," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 505-526, December.
    3. Corneliu Iațu & Bogdan-Constantin Ibănescu & Oana Mihaela Stoleriu & Alina Munteanu, 2018. "The WHS Designation—A Factor of Sustainable Tourism Growth for Romanian Rural Areas?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asongu, Simplice & Acha-Anyi, Paul, 2019. "Global Tourism and Waves of Terror: Perspectives from Military Expenditure," MPRA Paper 101793, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Farmaki, Anna & Altinay, Levent & Botterill, David & Hilke, Sarina, 2015. "Politics and sustainable tourism: The case of Cyprus," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 178-190.
    3. Farmaki, Anna, 2017. "The tourism and peace nexus," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 528-540.
    4. Compagnucci, Fabiano & Morettini, Gabriele, 2024. "Inner areas matter: A place-sensitive approach for the identification of the Daily Life Spaces in the Italian Abruzzo region," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    5. Bronner, Fred & de Hoog, Robert, 2014. "Vacationers and the economic “double dip” in Europe," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 330-337.
    6. Asongu, Simplice & Nnanna, Joseph & Biekpe, Nicholas & Acha-Anyi, Paul, 2018. "Contemporary Drivers of Global Tourism: Evidence from Terrorism and Peace Factors," MPRA Paper 91996, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Stanislav Hristov Ivanov & Craig Webster & Elitza Stoilova & Daniel Slobodskoy, 2022. "Biosecurity, crisis management, automation technologies and economic performance of travel, tourism and hospitality companies – A conceptual framework," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(1), pages 3-26, February.
    8. Simplice A. Asongu & Joseph I. Uduji & Elda N. Okolo-Obasi, 2019. "Tourism and insecurity in the world," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 66(4), pages 453-472, December.
    9. Claudio Detotto & Sauveur Giannoni & Claire Goavec, 2017. "Does good governance attract tourists?," Working Papers 002, Laboratoire Lieux, Identités, eSpaces et Activités (LISA).
    10. Seymur Ağazade & Egemen Güneş Tükenmez & Merve Uzun, 2023. "Is the volatility of international tourism revenues affected by tourism source market structure? An empirical analysis of Turkey," Tourism Economics, , vol. 29(2), pages 291-304, March.
    11. Aulia Akbar & Johannes Flacke & Javier Martinez & Martin F.A.M. van Maarseveen, 2020. "Spatial Knowledge: A Potential to Enhance Public Participation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-30, June.
    12. Caesar, Beate & Pallagst, Karina M., 2018. "Entwicklungspfade der grenzüberschreitenden Zusammenarbeit und Status quo," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Pallagst, Karina M. & Hartz, Andrea & Caesar, Beate (ed.), Border Futures - Zukunft Grenze - Avenir Frontière: Zukunftsfähigkeit grenzüberschreitender Zusammenarbeit, volume 20, pages 12-27, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    13. Kádár, Bálint & Gede, Mátyás, 2021. "Tourism flows in large-scale destination systems," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    14. Ivanov, Stanislav & Idzhylova, Kateryna & Webster, Craig, 2016. "Impacts of the entry of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea into the Russian Federation on its tourism industry: An exploratory study," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 162-169.
    15. Andrades, Lidia & Dimanche, Frederic, 2017. "Destination competitiveness and tourism development in Russia: Issues and challenges," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 360-376.
    16. Christos Kollias & Stephanos Papadamou, 2019. "Peace And Tourism: A Nexus? Evidence From Developed And Developing Countries," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 64(02), pages 323-339, March.
    17. Bianca Mitrică & Paul-Răzvan Şerban & Irena Mocanu & Nicoleta Damian & Ines Grigorescu & Monica Dumitraşcu & Cristina Dumitrică, 2021. "Developing an Indicator-Based Framework to Measure Sustainable Tourism in Romania. A Territorial Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Albert Santasusagna Riu & Ramon Galindo Caldés & Joan Tort Donada, 2019. "Furthering Internal Border Area Studies: An Analysis of Dysfunctions and Cooperation Mechanisms in the Water and River Management of Catalonia, Aragon and the Valencian Community (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-12, August.
    19. Tomasz Studzieniecki & Andrzej Jakubowski & Beata Meyer, 2022. "Key conditions for Euroregions development at external EU borders: A case study of the Polish–Belarusian borderland," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(4), pages 718-739, August.
    20. Sofia Karampela & Alexis Andreopoulos & Alex Koutsouris, 2021. "“Agro”, “Agri”, or “Rural”: The Different Viewpoints of Tourism Research Combined with Sustainability and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:41:y:2022:i:4:p:107-125:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.