IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v16y2022i1p575-583n44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Greening: politics and economics for social auditing. Sport management as common denominator

Author

Listed:
  • Vargas Vanesa Mădălina

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Niţă Sorin

    (University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Marin Aurel

    (National University of Physical Education and Sport, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Joga Florentina Ecaterina

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Stoica Mihaela-Ionica

    (Economist)

Abstract

This paper considers sport as a driver for politics and economics green incentives. While there are dichotomies in between green politics and economics, sport acts like a catalyst in between the two, by making use of its social dimension. In this respect, a stakeholder perspective is encouraged, especially when considering Corporate Social Responsibility coupled with ESG principles and non financial reporting. Sports is a 1.3 billion dollars industry that can set certain good practices and in this sense its “sport for development and peace” should be understood in broader terms. Social audits should be more extensive in order to capture better the links in between social, environment and governance factors, as reports from sports industry recently showed.

Suggested Citation

  • Vargas Vanesa Mădălina & Niţă Sorin & Marin Aurel & Joga Florentina Ecaterina & Stoica Mihaela-Ionica, 2022. "Greening: politics and economics for social auditing. Sport management as common denominator," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 575-583, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:575-583:n:44
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2022-0055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2022-0055
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2022-0055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Müller & Sven Daniel Wolfe & Christopher Gaffney & David Gogishvili & Miriam Hug & Annick Leick, 2021. "An evaluation of the sustainability of the Olympic Games," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(4), pages 340-348, April.
    2. Razvan HOINARU, 2017. "Follow the money. The impact of the illicit financial flows home and abroad. A common european-african perspective," Romanian Journal of Economics, Institute of National Economy, vol. 44(1(53)), pages 87-94, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sven Daniel Wolfe, 2023. "Building a better host city? Reforming and contesting the Olympics in Paris 2024," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(2), pages 257-273, March.
    2. J. James Reade, 2023. "Large Sporting Events and Public Health and Safety," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2023-04, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    3. Ji Wu & Madeleine Orr & Kurumi Aizawa & Yuhei Inoue, 2021. "Language Relativity in Legacy Literature: A Systematic Review in Multiple Languages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Alexander Budzier & Bent Flyvbjerg, 2024. "The Oxford Olympics Study 2024: Are Cost and Cost Overrun at the Games Coming Down?," Papers 2406.01714, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    5. Julia Lohmann & Jennifer Breithecker & Ulrike Ohl & Petra Gieß-Stüber & Hans Peter Brandl-Bredenbeck, 2021. "Teachers’ Professional Action Competence in Education for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Review from the Perspective of Physical Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Hojda Mihaela Hortensia, 2022. "Information security economics: cyber security threats," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 584-592, August.
    7. Pedro Janela Pinto & Gustavo Lopes dos Santos, 2022. "Olympic Waterfronts: An Evaluation of Wasted Opportunities and Lasting Legacies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-32, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:575-583:n:44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.