IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v16y2022i1p47-58n31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-creating sustainable competitiveness in an unpredictable business reality

Author

Listed:
  • De Valon Tiphaine

    (Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom and Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain)

  • Cegarra-Navarro Juan Gabriel

    (Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain)

  • Garcia-Perez Alexeis

    (Coventry University, Coventry, UK)

  • Martínez-Martínez Aurora

    (Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain)

Abstract

Businesses nowadays must perform in an overcrowded market. Globalisation and access to technologies have made the competition fierce and the differentiation complicated. New challenges related to sustainability have emerged as a result of an increased environmental awareness from consumers. Their demand is shifting, and companies must adapt to the competitive pressures, social demands and legal regulations towards sustainability. However, implementing sustainable initiatives might be costly and do not ensure enhanced financial outcomes. Co-creation was found in the literature to offer potential solutions to sustainability challenges by enabling businesses to benefit from knowledge from external resources, involving consumers in their activities and seeking their engagement and approval. But the current research lacks a sustainable applicability. Hence, this theoretical study reviewed the current literature to offer an updated state of the art regarding sustainable co-creation between businesses and consumers. It aims to provide answers to how this joint collaboration can support sustainable development for companies, what type of value it generates for both parties, and what factors make market competitiveness possible despite an absence of financial value creation. We were able to create a theoretical framework including the following factors: 1) Value sharing, which considers engaging consumers’ proactive behaviours to overcome inertia and engage in a process of sustainable self-improvement; 2) Relationship management, where common interests will be merged, and consumers empowered to investigate how sustainable development can be implemented in an objective of positive long-term co-evolution; 3) Knowledge sharing, where mutual learning and understanding will lead to a synergy of power and allows to elaborate a marketable and sustainable value proposition; and 4) Innovation, which is the outcome of an efficient co-creation, where internal and external capabilities are recombined to overcome barriers related to sustainable development. The study concluded that a combination of those factors results in competitive value creation.

Suggested Citation

  • De Valon Tiphaine & Cegarra-Navarro Juan Gabriel & Garcia-Perez Alexeis & Martínez-Martínez Aurora, 2022. "Co-creating sustainable competitiveness in an unpredictable business reality," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 47-58, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:47-58:n:31
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2022-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2022-0007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2022-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merz, Michael A. & Zarantonello, Lia & Grappi, Silvia, 2018. "How valuable are your customers in the brand value co-creation process? The development of a Customer Co-Creation Value (CCCV) scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 79-89.
    2. Anderson, Mark W. & Teisl, Mario & Noblet, Caroline, 2012. "Giving voice to the future in sustainability: Retrospective assessment to learn prospective stakeholder engagement," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1-6.
    3. Paul R. Carlile, 2002. "A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 442-455, August.
    4. Van den Broeke, Maud & Paparoidamis, Nicholas, 2021. "Engaging in or escaping co-creation? An analytical model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    5. Wiesmeth, Hans, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement for environmental innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 310-320.
    6. Pratima Bansal, 2005. "Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 197-218, March.
    7. Ronan de Kervenoael & Alexandre Schwob & Careen Chandra, 2020. "E-retailers and the engagement of delivery workers in urban last-mile delivery for sustainable logistics value creation: Leveraging legitimate concerns under time-based marketing promise," Post-Print hal-02780647, HAL.
    8. Rosa Maria Dangelico, 2016. "Green Product Innovation: Where we are and Where we are Going," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(8), pages 560-576, December.
    9. de Kervenoael, Ronan & Schwob, Alexandre & Chandra, Careen, 2020. "E-retailers and the engagement of delivery workers in urban last-mile delivery for sustainable logistics value creation: Leveraging legitimate concerns under time-based marketing promise," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    10. Pucci, Tommaso & Casprini, Elena & Galati, Antonino & Zanni, Lorenzo, 2020. "The virtuous cycle of stakeholder engagement in developing a sustainability culture: Salcheto winery," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 364-376.
    11. Bendell, Bari L. & Nesij Huvaj, M., 2020. "Does stakeholder engagement through corporate social and environmental behaviors affect innovation?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 685-696.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Gangi & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele & Nicola Varrone, 2021. "Assessing the impact of socially responsible human resources management on company environmental performance and cost of debt," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1511-1527, September.
    2. Sayantan Khanra & Puneet Kaur & Rojers P Joseph & Ashish Malik & Amandeep Dhir, 2022. "A resource‐based view of green innovation as a strategic firm resource: Present status and future directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1395-1413, May.
    3. Peter S. Hofman & Constantin Blome & Martin C. Schleper & Nachiappan Subramanian, 2020. "Supply chain collaboration and eco‐innovations: An institutional perspective from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2734-2754, September.
    4. Yu‐Xiang Yen, 2018. "Buyer–supplier collaboration in green practices: The driving effects from stakeholders," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1666-1678, December.
    5. Daniel Belanche & Marta Flavián & Alfredo Pérez-Rueda, 2020. "Mobile Apps Use and WOM in the Food Delivery Sector: The Role of Planned Behavior, Perceived Security and Customer Lifestyle Compatibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Giulio Mangano & Giovanni Zenezini & Anna Corinna Cagliano, 2021. "Value Proposition for Sustainable Last-Mile Delivery. A Retailer Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Wang, Haibo & Alidaee, Bahram, 2023. "White-glove service delivery: A quantitative analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Sarkar, Mitali & Dey, Bikash Koli & Ganguly, Baishakhi & Saxena, Neha & Yadav, Dharmendra & Sarkar, Biswajit, 2023. "The impact of information sharing and bullwhip effects on improving consumer services in dual-channel retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    9. Wójcik, Piotr & Obłój, Krzysztof & Buono, Anthony F., 2022. "Addressing social concern through business-nonprofit collaboration: Microfoundations of a firm’s dynamic capability for social responsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 119-139.
    10. Guoyou Qi & Hailiang Zou & Xuemei Xie, 2020. "Governmental inspection and green innovation: Examining the role of environmental capability and institutional development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1774-1785, July.
    11. Cinthya Flores‐Rivera & Ana M. Serrano‐Bedia & Gema García‐Piqueres, 2024. "Motivations and outcomes of environmental corporate sustainability in family and non‐family Mexican firms: The mediating role of eco‐innovation strategy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 357-374, January.
    12. Cedillo-Campos, Miguel Gastón & Piña-Barcenas, Jared & Pérez-González, Carlos Mario & Mora-Vargas, Jaime, 2022. "How to measure and monitor the transportation infrastructure contribution to logistics value of supply chains?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 120-129.
    13. Meinel, Martin & Eismann, Tobias T. & Baccarella, Christian V. & Fixson, Sebastian K. & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2020. "Does applying design thinking result in better new product concepts than a traditional innovation approach? An experimental comparison study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 661-671.
    14. Michael Kaethler, 2019. "Curating creative communities of practice: the role of ambiguity," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    16. Bárbara Galleli & Elder Semprebon & Joyce Aparecida Ramos dos Santos & Noah Emanuel Brito Teles & Mateus Santos de Freitas-Martins & Raquel Teodoro da Silva Onevetch, 2021. "Institutional Pressures, Sustainable Development Goals and COVID-19: How Are Organisations Engaging?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    17. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    18. Andersson, Ulf & Dasí, Àngels & Mudambi, Ram & Pedersen, Torben, 2016. "Technology, innovation and knowledge: The importance of ideas and international connectivity," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 153-162.
    19. Jinqiu He & Huiwen Su, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Green Innovation of Chinese Firms: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressure and International Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-21, October.
    20. Yousaf, Umair Bin & Ullah, Irfan & Jiang, Junchen & Wang, Man, 2022. "The role of board capital in driving green innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:47-58:n:31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.