IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v13y2019i1p1216-1226n107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The new economic good: Your own personal data. An integrative analysis of the Dark Web

Author

Listed:
  • Vargas Vanesa-Madalina

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Do you remember the times when the copyright or a patent had no economic value? Neither do I, because this happened more than 300 years ago when the printing activity took place completely free. It was the eighteenth century, when France, England, Germany and the United Kingdom realized that the author was pretty important for the state and the first regulations appeared. Exactly like the intellectual property, in the new era of technology, dynamic change and growing e-commerce, the data with personal character is the newest economic good. More and more studies and journals show that in the near future the personal information will also have an economic value since databases are so important for businesses, but also for other institutions like the police or even intelligence agencies. The current article is the first in a row of a complex research regarding the importance of the personal data in the current economy and its actual value in an organization. Further studies will be needed in order to conclude and create a model for measuring the value of personal data. This first step is a research and a detailed analysis of the current status-quo. The changes that appeared after the entry of the European directives regarding General Data Protection Regulation will be analyzed. Another significant section of the article is a close review of the personal data black market. In order to submit this aspect as clear and objective as possible, further research on the dark internet (Onion) was conducted and prices for clones of credit cards, Amazon or PayPal accounts and cloned personal documents were examined and charted.

Suggested Citation

  • Vargas Vanesa-Madalina, 2019. "The new economic good: Your own personal data. An integrative analysis of the Dark Web," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 1216-1226, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:1216-1226:n:107
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2019-0107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2019-0107
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2019-0107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beresford, Alastair R. & Kübler, Dorothea & Preibusch, Sören, 2012. "Unwillingness to pay for privacy: A field experiment," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 25-27.
    2. Beresford, Alastair R. & Kübler, Dorothea & Preibusch, Sören, 2011. "Unwillingness to pay for privacy: A field experiment," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2011-010, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Potoglou, Dimitris & Palacios, Juan & Feijoo, Claudio & Gómez Barroso, Jose-Luis, 2015. "The supply of personal information: A study on the determinants of information provision in e-commerce scenarios," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127174, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    2. Mechtenberg, Lydia & Münster, Johannes, 2011. "A strategic mediator who is biased into the same direction as the expert can improve information transmission," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2011-012, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    3. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2011-042 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Mechtenberg, Lydia & Münster, Johannes, 2012. "A strategic mediator who is biased in the same direction as the expert can improve information transmission," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 490-492.
    5. Nikolaus Hautsch & Julia Schaumburg & Melanie Schienle, 2015. "Financial Network Systemic Risk Contributions," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 19(2), pages 685-738.
    6. Bindseil, Ulrich & König, Philipp Johann, 2011. "The economics of TARGET2 balances," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2011-035, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    7. Anand, Kartik & Gai, Prasanna & Marsili, Matteo, 2012. "Rollover risk, network structure and systemic financial crises," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 1088-1100.
    8. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2011-045 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Hofmann, Dirk & Qari, Salmai, 2011. "The law of attraction bilateral search and horizontal heterogeneity," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2011-017, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    10. Mammen, Enno & Rothe, Christoph & Schienle, Melanie, 2016. "Semiparametric Estimation With Generated Covariates," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(5), pages 1140-1177, October.
    11. Moreno-Bromberg, Santiago & Taschini, Luca, 2011. "Pollution permits, strategic trading and dynamic technology adoption," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2011-042, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    12. David Ehrlich & Nora Szech, 2022. "How To Start a Grassroots Movement," Papers 2209.01345, arXiv.org.
    13. Benndorf, Volker & Kübler, Dorothea & Normann, Hans-Theo, 2015. "Privacy concerns, voluntary disclosure of information, and unraveling: An experiment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 43-59.
    14. Cheridito, Patrick & Horst, Ulrich & Kupper, Michael & Pirvu, Traian A., 2011. "Equilibrium pricing in incomplete markets under translation invariant preferences," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2011-083, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    15. Meyer-Gohde, Alexander, 2011. "Monetary policy, determinacy, and the natural rate hypothesis," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2011-049, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    16. Tor Eriksson & Lei Mao & Marie Claire Villeval, 2017. "Saving face and group identity," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 20(3), pages 622-647, September.
    17. Luc Bauwens & Christian M. Hafner & Diane Pierret, 2013. "Multivariate Volatility Modeling Of Electricity Futures," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 743-761, August.
    18. Bocart, Fabian Y.R.P. & Hafner, Christian M., 2012. "Econometric analysis of volatile art markets," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3091-3104.
    19. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2011-034 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2011-056 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Biener, Christian & Eling, Martin & Lehmann, Martin, 2020. "Balancing the desire for privacy against the desire to hedge risk," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 608-620.
    22. Jeffrey T. Prince & Scott Wallsten, 2022. "How much is privacy worth around the world and across platforms?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 841-861, November.
    23. Frik, Alisa & Gaudeul, Alexia, 2018. "An experimental method for the elicitation of implicit attitudes to privacy risk," MPRA Paper 87845, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    24. Frik, Alisa & Gaudeul, Alexia, 2016. "The relation between privacy protection and risk attitudes, with a new experimental method to elicit the implicit monetary value of privacy," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 296, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:1216-1226:n:107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.