IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v11y2017i1p276-283n29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of classical and modern teaching methods in business education

Author

Listed:
  • Conțu Eleonora Gabriela

    (University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Nowadays the training-educational process is a dynamic and complex process which uses both classical and modern teaching methods in order to obtain performance in education. Even though traditional teaching methods have a formal character interaction between teacher and students, this is face-to-face and therefore students can give an immediate feedback. From this point of view classical teaching methods are important from time to time. In Romania, in the European context the role of effective learning strategies represents the key point for the education process. The role of teachers in developing creativity to those students who want to learn in an interactive way is very important because they should imply that students directly in the training -educational process. In this context the educational process must be student centered because only in this way their critical thinking and creativity is developed. We can say that when non-formal and informal learning is combined with formal learning the scope of pedagogy is accomplish. In contemporary context education is regarded as an innovative concept which is used to produce performance at the individual level and also, at institutional level, education provides support in order to build strategies according to the challenges from the labour market. The paper is based on a qualitative research, conducted on a sample of 100 people aged between 19 and 23 years old (students at a Business School). The key question raised at this point is: What is the role of classical and modern teaching methods in training-educational process? The objectives of this study are the following: 1). highlighting the context of higher education in Romania; 2). presenting the role of university strategy in contemporary context; 3). highlighting the importance of using classical/modern teaching methods in business education; 4). presenting the role of innovation and creativity in business education; 5). presenting the analysis of qualitative research regarding the role of classical and modern teaching methods in education. Learning skills are developed both through modern teaching and learning strategies based on creativity and interactive learning methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Conțu Eleonora Gabriela, 2017. "The role of classical and modern teaching methods in business education," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 276-283, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:276-283:n:29
    DOI: 10.1515/picbe-2017-0029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/picbe-2017-0029
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/picbe-2017-0029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viorel Lefter & Constantin Brătianu & Adriana Agapie & Simona Agoston & Ivona Orzea, 2011. "Intergenerational knowledge transfer in the academic environment of knowledge-based economy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(30), pages 392-403, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruxandra Bejinaru & Cristian Valentin Hapenciuc & Iulian Condratov & Pavel Stanciu, 2018. "The University Role in Developing the Human Capital for a Sustainable Bioeconomy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 583-583, August.
    2. Glaser-Segura Daniel & Wilson Jennifer & Mudge Suzanne, 2018. "Development of an instructional practices scale for business school curricula," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 416-424, May.
    3. Gabriela PRELIPCEAN & Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2016. "Universities as Learning Organizations in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 4(4), pages 469-492, December.
    4. Alexandra-Maria Drule & Irimie Emil Popa & Razvan Nistor & Alexandru Chis, 2014. "Quality of the Teaching Process and its Factors of Influence from the Perspective of Future Business Specialists," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(37), pages 827-827, August.
    5. Elena Gurgu & Rocsana Tonis (Bucea-Manea), 2018. "Ethical Universities of Integrity and Ethics Management in the Romanian University Environment," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 7(4), pages 69-79, December.
    6. Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2017. "Knowledge strategies aiming to improve the intellectual capital of universities," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 500-523, September.
    7. Bratianu Constantin, 2017. "Strategic thinking in turbulent times," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 248-254, July.
    8. Corina Georgiana ?ERBAN (PATRINTAS) & Andreea-Nicoleta BICHEL & Denisa ?ARANU & Drago? BUJOR, 2023. "Covid-19 Crisis Impact on Leadership: Innovation, Digitalization and CSR Dimensions," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(1), pages 78-91, March.
    9. Bratianu Constantin, 2020. "From Thermodynamic Entropy to Knowledge Entropy," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 589-596, July.
    10. Daniel Lovin & Monica Raducan & Alexandru Capatina & Nicoleta Cristache, 2021. "Sustainable Knowledge Transfer from Business Simulations to Working Environments: Correlational vs. Configurational Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Dima Alina-Mihaela & Meghisan-Toma Georgeta-Madalina, 2018. "Reserch on implementing education for sustainable development," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 300-310, May.
    12. Pencheva Miglena, 2018. "Methodological aspects of examination of leadership and organizational culture influence on knowledge conversion in public administration," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 760-771, May.
    13. Bejinaru Ruxandra & Prelipcean Gabriela, 2017. "Successful strategies to be learnt from world-class universities," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 350-358, July.
    14. Bratianu Constantin, 2018. "A critical analysis of intellectual capital research in universities," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 151-160, May.
    15. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:49:p:583 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Bogdan Gabriel Nistoreanu & Georgica Gheorghe, 2014. "The Perception of the Academics and Students Regarding the Entrepreneurial Education Iin Economic Education," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(37), pages 811-811, August.
    17. Gloria Aparicio & Txomin Iturralde & Ana Vilma Rodríguez, 2023. "Developments in the knowledge-based economy research field: a bibliometric literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 317-352, February.
    18. Valentina Mihaela Ghinea & Alina Mihaela Dima & Shahrazad Hadad, 2017. "Excellence Model for Sustainable Convergence in the EU Higher Education," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(S11), pages 1107-1107.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:276-283:n:29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.