IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/otamic/v12y2020i1p2148-2157n10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model and data management issues in the integrated assessment of existing building stocks

Author

Listed:
  • Honic Meliha

    (Technische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria)

  • Kovacic Iva

    (Technische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria)

Abstract

The increasing population growth and urbanization rises the worldwide consumption of material resources and energy demand. The challenges of the future will be to provide sufficient resources and to minimize the continual amount of waste and energy demand. For the achievement of sustainability, increasing recycling rates and reuse of materials, next to the reduction of energy consumption has the highest priority.This article presents the results of the multidisciplinary research project SCI_BIM, which is conducted on an occupied existing building. Within SCI_BIM, a workflow for coupling digital technologies for scanning and modeling of buildings is developed. Laser scanning is used for capturing the geometry, and ground-penetrating radar is used for assessing material composition. For the semi-automated generation of an as-built BIM, algorithms are developed, wherefore the Point-Cloud serves as a basis. The BIM-model is used for energy modeling and analysis as well as for the automated compilation of Material Passports. Further, a gamification concept will be developed to motivate the buildings’ users to collect data. By applying the gamification concept, the reduction of energy consumption together with an automated update of the as-built BIM will be tested. This article aims to analyze the complex interdisciplinary interactions, data, and model exchange processes of various disciplines collaborating within SCI_BIM.Results show that the developed methodology is confronted with many challenges. Nevertheless, it has the potential to serve as a basis for the creation of secondary raw materials cadaster and for the optimization of energy consumption in existing buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Honic Meliha & Kovacic Iva, 2020. "Model and data management issues in the integrated assessment of existing building stocks," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 2148-2157, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:2148-2157:n:10
    DOI: 10.2478/otmcj-2020-0011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2020-0011
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/otmcj-2020-0011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Fellows & Anita M.M. Liu, 2012. "Managing organizational interfaces in engineering construction projects: addressing fragmentation and boundary issues across multiple interfaces," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(8), pages 653-671, February.
    2. Paul H. Brunner, 2011. "Urban Mining A Contribution to Reindustrializing the City," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 15(3), pages 339-341, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Yufeng & Yin, Xiaofei & Zhang, Qijun & Wang, Wei & Mu, Xianzhong, 2014. "The recycling of rare earths from waste tricolor phosphors in fluorescent lamps: A review of processes and technologies," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 21-31.
    2. Matteo Francesco Ruta & Francesco Pittau & Gabriele Masera, 2024. "Towards Zero-Carbon Buildings: Challenges and Opportunities from Reversing the Material Pyramid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-27, May.
    3. Konrad Nübel & Michael Max Bühler & Thorsten Jelinek, 2021. "Federated Digital Platforms: Value Chain Integration for Sustainable Infrastructure Planning and Delivery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Damián Burneo & José M. Cansino & Rocio Yñiguez, 2020. "Environmental and Socioeconomic Impacts of Urban Waste Recycling as Part of Circular Economy. The Case of Cuenca (Ecuador)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.
    5. A. S. M. Sazzad Parveg & Ramin Ordikhani-Seyedlar & Tejasvi Sharma & Scott K. Shaw & Albert Ratner, 2022. "A Recycling Pathway for Rare Earth Metals (REMs) from E-Waste through Co-Gasification with Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Oleksandr Galychyn & B.D. Fath & D. Wiedenhofer & E. Buonocore & P.P. Franzese, 2024. "An urban emergy footprint: Comparing supply- and use-extended input-output models for the case of Vienna, Austria," Post-Print hal-04507173, HAL.
    7. Qiming Sun & Qiong Huang & Zhuocheng Duan & Anxiao Zhang, 2022. "Recycling Potential Comparison of Mass Timber Constructions and Concrete Buildings: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Carlos Mesta & Ramzy Kahhat & Sandra Santa‐Cruz, 2019. "Geospatial Characterization of Material Stock in the Residential Sector of a Latin‐American City," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 280-291, February.
    9. Meylan, Grégoire & Reck, Barbara K., 2017. "The anthropogenic cycle of zinc: Status quo and perspectives," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-10.
    10. Augiseau, Vincent & Barles, Sabine, 2017. "Studying construction materials flows and stock: A review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 153-164.
    11. Monika Kasina & Piotr Rafał Kowalski & Bartłomiej Kajdas & Marek Michalik, 2020. "Assessment of Valuable and Critical Elements Recovery Potential in Ashes from Processes of Solid Municipal Waste and Sewage Sludge Thermal Treatment," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Shojaei, Reyhaneh S. & Burgess, Gemma, 2022. "Non-technical inhibitors: Exploring the adoption of digital innovation in the UK construction industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    13. Wallsten, Björn & Magnusson, Dick & Andersson, Simon & Krook, Joakim, 2015. "The economic conditions for urban infrastructure mining: Using GIS to prospect hibernating copper stocks," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 85-97.
    14. Stephan Kampelmann, 2020. "Wood works: How local value chains based on urban forests contribute to place-based circular economy," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/308602, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    15. Schiller, Georg & Müller, Felix & Ortlepp, Regine, 2017. "Mapping the anthropogenic stock in Germany: Metabolic evidence for a circular economy," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 93-107.
    16. Vincent Augiseau & Eunhye Kim, 2021. "Inflows and Outflows from Material Stocks of Buildings and Networks and their Space-Differentiated Drivers: The Case Study of the Paris Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Kazançoglu, Yigit & Ada, Erhan & Ozturkoglu, Yucel & Ozbiltekin, Melisa, 2020. "Analysis of the barriers to urban mining for resource melioration in emerging economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    18. Bruno Moeremans & Michaël Dooms & Elvira Haezendonck, 2023. "Long-term analysis of traffic flows in European inland ports: implications for the port–city interface," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(2), pages 272-300, June.
    19. Karine Dufossé & Marine Marie-Charlotte & Vincent Augiseau & Thierry Henrion & Hayet Djelal, 2021. "Quantification and Environmental Assessment of Wood Ash from Biomass Power Plants: Case Study of Brittany Region in France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Svana Helen Björnsdottir & Pall Jensson & Saemundur E. Thorsteinsson & Ioannis M. Dokas & Robert J. de Boer, 2022. "Benchmarking ISO Risk Management Systems to Assess Efficacy and Help Identify Hidden Organizational Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-33, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:2148-2157:n:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.