IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/organi/v54y2021i4p306-318n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Content Analysis of Gossip at Different Levels of a Hospital

Author

Listed:
  • Aghbolagh Maryam Babaei

    (Department of Management, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran)

  • Ardabili Farzad Sattari

    (Department of Management, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran)

  • Voitenko Elena

    (Department of Psychology, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

Background: Most societies have a negative attitude toward gossip and managers are concerned about the impact of gossips on the communication in an organizational environment. Our study examined the perception of gossip, and the context of gossip at different levels of a hospital, a case of organization with high communicational relation among staff. Also, the differences between the gossip context within the organizational context and within the social environment have been considered. Methodology: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 informants, 9 in each of three groups: nurses, supervisors and managers of the Hospital. Recorded interviews were analyzed using content analysis, and results for each group of respondents were compared. Finally, the main gossiping issues for each group were categorized. Results: The study revealed that the topics of gossip in a hospital can be divided into eight main categories, and 34 sub-categories all identifiable by special topics. These main topics included confidentiality issues, merits, financial status/standing, personal characteristics, position, communications, biography, and job conditions. In terms of organizational gossip, a person’s merit in the workplace and financial standing were of particular interest to the participants of this study. Also, the gossip topics at different levels among nurses, administrators, and managers had significant differences. Conclusion: Managers should acknowledge different gossip contents among people at different organizational levels, and that employees do not have the same motives for communication at different organizational levels. Additionally, the distances between contents in the Tendency to Gossip Questionnaire and categories in the organizational environment need more studies, to explore precedents and outputs. Managers may use these findings to facilitate organizational change and communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Aghbolagh Maryam Babaei & Ardabili Farzad Sattari & Voitenko Elena, 2021. "Content Analysis of Gossip at Different Levels of a Hospital," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 54(4), pages 306-318, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:organi:v:54:y:2021:i:4:p:306-318:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/orga-2021-0021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2021-0021
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/orga-2021-0021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:organi:v:54:y:2021:i:4:p:306-318:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.